Roberto
dei Mattei is still selling his obsolete book on Vatican Council II. Obviously
when he interprets the Council with a fakse premise there is a break with
Tradition. He cannot blame the Council. Since if he dares to interpret Vatican
Council II with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue’ the Council will
be affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
which he does not affirm in public, for whatever reason. He is a correspondent of
the Catholic Family News which also interprets the Council like the liberals
and the Left and not like me.- Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024
Matt Gaspers editor Catholic Family News and traditionalists interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X irrationally. They interpret this traditional catechism with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. I avoid this error.
Matt Gaspers editor Catholic Family News and traditionalists interpret the Catechism of Pope Pius X irrationally. They interpret this traditional catechism with 'the red being an exception for the blue'. I avoid this error.
Catechism of the Pope Pius X : the red is not an exception for the blue
For them the hypothetical (red) passages being exceptions for the orthodox (blue) passages which support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is dishonesty among the traditionalists. They go for the Latin Mass and use a fake premise (invisible people are visible in 2024) to avoid being labeled Feeneyite on EENS. The Lefebvrists in general are Cushingites.
The Lefebvrists also interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally, like the USCCB Doctrinal Committee and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. They make the same mistake with Vatican Council II too.
Matt Gaspers would also be interpreting the Nicene, Apostles and the Athanasius Creed irrationally. He goes along with the objective error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. It was repeated by Pope Paul VI (1965). The same mistake was made by Archbishop Lefebvre and Coetus International.
The ecclesiology of the Roman Missal is Feeneyite by correspondents of the CFN would interpret it with Cushingism.
-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024
All the books on Vatican Council II written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete. He interpreted the Council irrationally, with the red being an exception for the blue. Also all those articles and statements by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano on Vatican Council II are now meaningless.
All the books on Vatican Council II written by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre are now obsolete. He interpreted the Council irrationally, with the red being an exception for the blue. Also all those articles and statements by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano on Vatican Council II are now meaningless. We know that Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. 'the red is not an exception for the blue' has a continuity with the pre-1949 Magisterium. There is continuity with the middle Ages.
Over the last 15 years there has been a new discovery i.e., the red is not an exception for the blue. The passages marked in red are hypothetical and so do not contradict the orthodox and exclusivist passages marked in blue in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, Dominus Iesus etc.
So the Catholic Family News recent interview/statement of Archbishop Vigano by Matt Gaspers is behind times. The relevant questions were not put to the Italian archbishop.1
He stands excommunicated by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Archbishop-elect John Joseph Kennedy who both interpreted the Council and the Catechism irrationally i.e. the red is an exception for the blue, during the schism trial.
CFN Contributors:
1
https://catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2024/07/19/exclusive-abp-vigano-clarifies-his-position-following-ddf-ruling-part-i/
_____________________
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024
The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.
The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) bishops, their Superior General, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Roberto dei Mattei and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, are still interpreting Vatican Council II with ‘the red being an exception for the blue’. There is no comment from the SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass in Rome and at Albano, Italy.
Archbishop Vigano has praised Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre but both of them, Vigano and Lefebvre, did not interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms, with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue’. They both, though, were correct in rejecting Vatican Council II (irrational- the red is an exception for the blue).
If they have any questions they can e-mail me at this contact number:
They can also meet me personally in Rome.
- Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/09/the-society-of-st.html
MAY 20, 2024
Mattei is still selling his Cushingite book on Vatican Council II
Roberto dei Mattei still interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, like the Rome Vicariate, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the parish priest at the church where he has his office in Rome.
That he goes for the Latin Mass makes no difference?
He wrote a book on Vatican Council II which was Cushingite. He is still selling it.
There is no discussion or dialogue on this subject. - Lionel Andardes
JUNE 24, 2021
For Roberto dei Mattei at the conferences with the Franciscans of the Immaculate Vatican Council II was only a pastoral Council and not dogmatic : we now know it is in harmony with EENS when interpreted without the false premise
Roberto dei Mattei wrote a book on Vatican Council II in which he did not avoid the false premise.The book was written with the fake premise. He could have avoided the error if he knew about it.There is no correction or apology from him. He continues to interpret the Council with the error instead of without the error.He will not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).It's the same for Chris Ferrara,Michael Matt and the other
Lefebvrists.
The conferences with the Franciscans of the Immaculate, in which Vatican Council II was described as only a pastoral Council, was in error.Vatican Council II is a dogmatic Council in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions and the Syllabus of Errors with no exception. - Lionel Andrades
APRIL 13, 2018
There is no apology or correction from Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara for the books they wrote on Vatican Council II.They need to apologise for their ignorance, which was innocent.
There is no apology or correction from Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara for the books they wrote on Vatican Council II.They need to apologize for their ignorance, which was innocent.There was no one there to correct them at that time.But now they know and should clarify that it was an error.
So in the books on Vatican Council II written by Ferrara and Mattei, Vatican Council II is projected as a rupture with Tradition since the writers mixed up what is invisible and as being visible.They then projected these unknowable people as being known examples of salvation outside the Church.
When they wrote their books, Vatican Council II could also have been projected as a continuity with Tradition and the dogma EENS.
So the Magisterium of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), made a mistake at that time.Since the CDF Prefect assumed that unknown people were known it was an objective mistake.Since he assumed that people in Heaven saved, were visible on earth, it was a factual mistake.Since he assumed that people in Heaven were also present on earth at the same time,he violated the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The same mistake unknowingly, was made by Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Attila Guimares, Michael Davies and Diterich von Hildebrand in their books and articles.
In their books they were saying that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition.This was true.Since a false premise is used.The educated Catholic recognizes the non traditional conclusion.
Even Pope John Paul II was aware of the rupture with Tradition.However what was not known to also Fr.John Hardon, Fr. William Most, Monsgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton and other good apologists, was that the actual false premise was visible for us BOD,BOB and I.I and it caused the rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology etc).
Now that Ferrara and Mattei know, there must be an apology or correction from them.Soon there will be the summer conferences of the traditionalists where the same error will be repeated,like in former years, even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades