Roberto
dei Mattei cites St. Francis Xavier to criticize Pope Francis’ statement on
all religions being paths to salvation. But Mattei too is politically correct
with the Left, like the pope. He interprets Vatican Council II
irrationally and so does not have to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus like Xavier and the Jesuit missionaries in the 16th century.
In
his recent report, he implies that outside the Church there is no salvation,
but he does not want to say it himself. It is only St. Francis Xavier who says it.
He
reminds me of the sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond, who say outside the
Church there is no salvation but then interpret Vatican Council II as a break and not continuity , with Feeneyite
extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Or,
he reminds me of Michael Matt at the Remnant who kept saying, ‘Give us back our
Tradition’- and when it is there for the asking, he does not want it. It would
displease the SPLC and ADL.
John
Henry Westen too does not want to go underground just yet and Archbishop
Vigano too - is a rich man.
Probably
Pope Francis issued that statement in Singapore, under the same pressure from
the Left, which is there on Mattei, Matt, Westen and all the sedevacantists who
are ready to oppose the pope but not the Zionists.
Bishop
Athanasius Schneider has stated that the Vatican does not want to say Jesus is
the only Savior of the world. True. But more relevant, the Vatican, like him,
does not want to say that Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with
Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an Athanasius Creed, with no
exceptions. Instead, they are all accepting the objective mistake ( or
political mistake) of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF/DCF) to the
Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center(LOHO).
At
the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, the professors, like Ralph Martin,
are told that they must accept the New Theology of the 1949 LOHO. It is obligatory. It was
only, based upon alleged exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus,
that Bishop Robert Barron could tell Ben Shapiro that he did not need to enter the
Church for salvation. It was based upon allegedly physically visible cases of
non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own and who are following their conscience ( Lumen
Gentium 16) that extra ecclesiam nulla salus, could be made obsolete. And so the Jesuit Pope Francis
could issue his Singapore heresy, contradicting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, changing the
interpretation of the Nicene Creed, rejecting the Athanasius Creed, putting
aside all the Catechisms including that of Pope John Paul II , rejecting traditional
mission based upon there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church which
is not contradicted with Vatican Council II, interpreted, rationally, i.e.
Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 2024 etc, etc.
So
is Roberto dei Mattei going to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus like St. Francis Xavier? No. He only admires
the Jesuit priest. He cannot imitate him. - Lionel Andrades
