Bishop Bernard Fellay still cannot see the Council as traditional and being in agreement with the dogma and the Syllabus. He does not seem to realize that the liberal, modernist interpertations of the Council are due to the false premise- and this false premise is also held by the SSPX and other traditionalists.
WEBSITE OF ST.BENEDICT CENTER,STILL RIVER
The website St.Benedict Center, Still River,Massachusetts, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary; the community of Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,(1) could affirm the text of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. If there are protests they could state that they accept implicit baptism of desire and implicit invincible ignorance known only to God.
So they do not reject these cases.
They accept implicit desire etc along with the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.It does not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. It does not contradict the ordinary means of salvation which is Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.
Similarly, they do not reject Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.Since there is nothing in either of them to contradict the dogma on salvation.
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Catholic Faith expressed in Dominus Iesus 20, Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846, Vatican Council II(, AG 7,LG 14) etc.
They should not be asked to deny the Catholic Faith on their website.
It's the Paulist Fathers who deny the defined dogma , CCC 845,846, Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14 being contradicted by LG 16).The Paulist Fathers assume that we can see the dead saved.In Worcester and Boston they can shake hands with people saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire and no body protests at this irrationality -Lionel Andrades
1
No comments:
Post a Comment