The SSPX, USA has posted on its website its Declaration on the Post-Synodal Exhortation Amoris Laetitia by Pope Francis (March 19, 2016) but there is no declaration on the Vatican Document on inter-religious dialogue with the Jews.So expectedly there will be no comment on the objective mistake Bishop Fellay made on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and Vatican Council II as reported on this blog.
Since if Bishop Fellay does not interpret EENS and Vatican Council II assuming hypothetical cases are objectively known in the present times,then Vatican Council II, like EENS, would be saying all Jews and other non Catholics and non Christians, are oriented to Hell for not being formal members of the Catholic Church. This would be opposed by the Jewish Left and the Vatican which is presently following a pro-Mason policy.He would be considered Anti-Semitic.
-Lionel Andrades
June 13, 2016
No one to defend Bishop Bernard Fellay : Heresy
June 13, 2016
No one to defend Bishop Bernard Fellay : Heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/no-one-to-defend-bishop-bernard-fellay.html
JUNE 13, 2016
The doctrinal position of Bishop Bernard Fellay is heretical. He also contradicts the SSPX doctrinal General Chapter Statement 2012 which affirmed EENS with NO exceptions
http://eucharistandmission.blospot.it/2016/06/the-doctrinal-position-of-bishop.html
Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on hypothetical cases being explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/cardinal-muller-archbishop-di-noia-and.html
CARDINAL GERHARD MULLER, ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DI NOIA, BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY MISTAKE HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES AS BEING EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/cardinal-gerhard-muller-archbishop.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/apologists-mons-clifford-fenton.html
June 10, 2016
Here are the controversial passages again
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/here-are-controversial-passages-again.html
Apologists Mons. Clifford Fenton, Fr.William Most and Fr. John Hardon considered implicit cases as being explicit: traditionalists agree any one who does this is wrong
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/apologists-mons-clifford-fenton.html
June 10, 2016
Here are the controversial passages again
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/here-are-controversial-passages-again.html
No comments:
Post a Comment