What are we defending Vatican Council II any more for ?
Since there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II. 1.One of the Lefebvrist traditionalists, the liberals and Masons and the other 2. mine.
There is Vatican Council II 1.Cushingite and Vatican Council II 2.Feeneyite.
The liberals and traditionalists only know of Vatican Council II Cushingite. It is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the old ecumenism, the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors. It is heretical. It supports apostasy in the Church and it is the only Vatican Council II understood by the popes, cardinals and bishops.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) is in harmony with the past ecclesiology, the ecumenism of return, Syllabus of Errors and the old Catechisms.
There are also two interpretations of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). There can be BOD, BOB and I.I, Cushingite or Feeneyite.
So one can interpret Vatican Council II with BOD, BOB and I.I Cushingite or BOD,BOB and I.I, Feeneyite.
It is the same with the Catechisms. We can interpet the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) with BOD,BOB and I.I, Cushingite or Feeneyite.The conclusion changes. The conclusion is different.
-Lionel Andrades
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment