Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church have a hermeneutic of continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) only when interpreted with what I call the Lionel Andrades model.Otherwise I have called it the Feeneyite approach, as opposed to the Cushingite version or the interpretation of magisterial documents with the false premise( invisible people are visible).
Without the Feeneyite approach Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church would be a break with the Catechism of Pope Pius X on ecumenism and no salvation outside the Church.The Catechism of the Catholic Church would be a rupture with EENS according to the 14th, 15th and 16th century-Magisterium.It would also not have a continuity with the Syllabus of Errors which affirms the past ecclesiology of the Church.
Since if invincible ignorance etc in the Catechism of Pope Pius X is interpreted with common Cushingism, the hermeneutic of rupture is created.A false premise produces a non traditional conclusion, a false result.
-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 10, 2018
So now we can interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the 'strict interpretation' of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and without the hermeneutic of rupture. This is the Lionel Andrades model
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/so-now-we-can-interpret-vatican-council.html
SEPTEMBER 8, 2018
Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Cushing were wrong.Literally there are no baptism of desire cases.Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj was wrong at the Placuet Deo Press Conference. Literally there are no known cases of non Catholics saves outside the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/frleonard-feeney-was-correct-and-pope.html
No comments:
Post a Comment