March 15, 2018
Announcement and apology expected from Bishop Daniel Dolan, Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr. Anthony Cekada
In
2015 I wrote to Fr. Anthony Cekada, sedevacantist at the St. Gertrude
the Great Church, Ohio,USA telling him that there are no known cases
of the baptism of desire in our reality and the long list of his
references to the baptism of desire do not state that they refer to personally known people saved outside the Church. No pope or saint has said this.
However he infers that the saints and popes were referring to known
people saved outside the Church.So the baptism of desire is an exception
to his concept of Feeneyism.
ANNOUNCEMENT AWAITED
Common
sense tells us that the baptism of desire is always hypothetical for
us. So the baptism of desire never ever was an exception to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So when will he make an announcement saying they were wrong on this issue?
For
him the baptism of desire was an exception to Feeneyite EENS and so he
wanted the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney, the St. Benedict Center in
the USA to say the same. Since they would not do so he accused them of being in mortal sin.
He
needed to apologize to the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary since
now we know that hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire were not
relevant or exceptions to EENS.
VATICAN COUNCIL II NO MORE BASIS FOR SEDEVACANTISM
Today
I reminded him via e-mail that not only is the baptism of desire not an
exception to Feeneyite EENS since there are no practical exceptions but
there are no exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II. Vatican Council
II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors etc. So with Vatican
Council II not a rupture with Tradition( when hypothetical cases are
interpreted as just being hypothetical and not objective exceptions to
EENS) then there is no reason to go into sedevacantism assuming
Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition.
FLIPPANT
He
responded flippantly.Probably he wants me to come back after another
three years and he will still be teaching the seminarians that Vatican
Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors and there are objective
cases of the baptism of desire which are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in
2015-2018.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE A RUPTURE WITH FEENEYITE EENS FOR THREE SEDEVACANTIST BISHOPS
The
Pastor at the St.Gertrude the Great church, their principal church, is
Bishop Daniel Dolan.He was ordained a bishop in 1992 by Bishop Mark
Pivarunas of the Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI).It is
also a traditionalist sedevacantist community which interprets Vatican
Council II as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.Also for them the
the baptism of desire is a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.Yesterday I
e-mailed these blog posts to the CMRI and Bishop Pivarunas.There is no
response from him.
I
have also e-mailed Bishop Donald Sanborn, the founder of the
sedevacantist Most Holy Trinity Seminary, Florida.Fr.Anthony Cekada is a
member of the faculty. .
When will Fr.Anthony Cekada have the integrity to
say that he made a mistake about the baptism of desire(BOD) and the
Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary being in mortal sin ?
Over three years, he knows that the BOD can be interpreted as being 1) visible and known in personal cases or 2)
just hypothetical.The conclusion is different. That it is hypothetical
for us is common sense.It was obviously hypothetical for the popes and
saints in the past too.
FR.CEKADA MADE A MISTAKE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II TOO
Fr.Cekada
made a similar mistake with Vatican Council II. He interpreted Lumen
Gentium 16(invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 14( case of the
catechumen) as being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So his inference was
that these were known people.Otherwise they could not be
exceptions.For him these were known cases of salvation outside the
Church.So Vatican Council II became a rupture with Tradition and he went
into sedevacantism,when the fault lay with this false premise.
Three
years back perhaps there was a problem with comprehension on his part
but now after being informed are we dealing with deception and sin ?
FR.CEKADA KNOWS THERE ARE NO KNOWN CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IN 2018
There
should be an announcement from Fr. Anthony Cekada saying that he agrees
that there are no known cases of the baptism of desire in our reality.
Mystici
Corporis, Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X are
referring to hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of
blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.
SEDEVACANTIST INFERENCE WAS WRONG.
So
these Magisterial documents never were objective exceptions to the
traditional interpretation of outside the Church there is no
salvation.The inference of the sedevacantists were wrong.
TRADITIONALISTS AND SEDEVACANTISTS MADE A MISTAKE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
Fr.Cekada
also needs to announce that LG 8,LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA2 ,GS 22 etc
refer to invisible people in 2018 and so they are not exceptions to the
old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. They are not
exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism etc.So we can affirm
Vatican Council II and Feeneyite EENS.Vatican Council II is compatible
with the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
FAITHFUL NEED TO BE INFORMED
It
is not a rupture with Tradition as the traditionalists and
sedevacantists wrongly believed over the last 50 years.They need to
announce that they made a mistake in their interpretation of Vatican
Council and the Council is no more a reason to go into sedevacantism.
This
announcement should also be made for the interests of seminarians,the
faithful and Catholics at large, by Bishop Daniel Dolan and Bishop
Donald Sanborn.
-Lionel Andrades
http://www.traditionalmass.org/priests/dolan.php
http://www.traditionalmass.org/priests/sanborn.php
http://www.sgg.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/20180311.pdf
https://sggresources.org/http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=28&catname=2
_________________________________________
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/03/announcement-and-apology-expected-from.html
No comments:
Post a Comment