Br. Andre Maria's recent 'We affirm
that the dogma 'Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus' must be
interpreted according to the official doctrine of the Church” 1
Lionel:
It
is ambiguous since the he does not clarify that he is interpreting
Vatican Council II and the the dogma EENS with Feeneyism and not
Cushingism.
However
in his correspondence with the Secretary of the CDF Brother Andre Marie MICM, has stated 2 that
there are no personally known cases of being saved in invincible
ignorance. So there he was using Feeneyism(hypothetical
cases are just hypothetical and not personally known non Catholics
saved outside the Church) and not Cushingism( theoretical cases of BOD,
I.I, BOB etc are objective exceptions to EENS in the present times).
However
if he interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism the CDF may
decide with their Leftist political position today, that he is legally not a Catholic.
-Lionel Andrades
1
7. We affirm that the dogma “Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus” must be interpreted according to the official doctrine of the Church.7
https://catholicism.org/doctrinal-belief.html
2
If God Almighty chooses to lead a soul in invincible ignorance to Him and to His Church through some extraordinary means,it is, in conformity with Bl.Pope Pius IX's admonition supra,not for me to identify if profession of faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour and sacramental Baptism is not needed to be imparted to that soul.This is the Almighty's competence...
https://df9ixb8c8gy4m.cloudfront.net/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2019/01/20170307-Letter.pdfhttps://fundingmorality.com/project/view/saint-benedict.html
No comments:
Post a Comment