April 3, 2014
There is no text in Vatican Council II which contradicts Feeneyism
Feeneyism
is the official teaching of the Catholic Church unless one assumes
implicit for us baptism of desire is explicit for us.
According to Feeneyism every one needs to enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism' and there are no exceptions.
According to Feeneyism the baptism of desire is not an exception to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
According
to Cushingism every one does not need to enter the Catholic Church
with faith and baptism in 2014 and there are exceptions.
According to Cushingism the baptism of desire is an exception to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
According
to Feeneyism Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) is not an
exception to Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism) and the dogma on
exclusive salvation. Vatican Council II is not confusing.
According to Cushingism Lumen Gentium 16 is an exception.Vatican Council II contradicts itself.
Feeneyism says there are no exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Cushingism says there are exceptions. Cushingism is heresy.
The Society of
St.Pius X, Fischer More College and other traditionalists have been
using Cushingism. For liberals Cushingism is the basis for liberalism
and dissent with reference to Vatican Council II.
Vatican Council
II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 of Pope Pius XII, in two
theological papers of the International Theological Commission, are
interpreted according to Cushingism. The ITC papers were approved by
Pope Benedict XVI.
Pope Francis expects the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate
to accept Vatican Council II according to Cushingism, only then will
they be allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass in Rome.
The
Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate could end the dead lock by
announcing that they interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial
documents according to Feeneyism. So they affirm Vatican Council II and
Tradition ( the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, the Syllabus of Errors etc).
Similarly
Michael King, the President of Fischer-More College, USA could announce
that they affirm Vatican Council II according to Feeneyism . He can ask
Bishop Michael Olson, the bishop of Fort Worth, and the FSSP priests
there, to also do the same.
The SSPX could
clarify that in a discussion on the subject of the baptism of desire,
there could be confusion over invisible for us baptism of desire and
visible to us baptism of desire and that invisible for us baptism of
desire, is their rational choice.
They also need to point out the
factual error on the website of the International Theological
Commission. The same error is there on the SSPX website under the
subject Feeneyism. The SSPX is critical of Feeneyism since for the SSPX,
Feeneyism refers to the rejection of explicit for us baptism of desire.
-Lionel AndradesPhoto: Fr.Leonard Feeney- now at the centre of two interpretations of Vatican Council II.
http://www.marymediatrix.com/religious-life/friars.html
No comments:
Post a Comment