The anonymous Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism; without the false premise,making the Council ecclesiocentric in its ecclesiology.So with Vatican Council II being only Christological for them the citation from Dominus Iesus 14 and 16 was enough.Since with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger,everyone is saved through Jesus and the Church and so they do not necessarily have to become members of the Catholic Church or even know or believe in Jesus.1
So since they are saved in their different religions, this would include the Amazon.
The anonymous Coetus Internationalis Patrum had to cite Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus without the false premise. They had to do it without the invisible- people- are- visible- in- 2019premise.Then they could show how Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus supports the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
_________________________________
Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus
_________________________________
OCTOBER 4, 2019
Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus
__________________________________
They can still issue another statement and coordinate with me,since I am the only person writing on this issue.The aim would be to share information, correct the error and not condemn any one.-Lionel Andrades
1
DOMINUS IESUS
14. It must therefore be firmly believed as a truth of Catholic faith that the universal salvific will of the One and Triune God is offered and accomplished once for all in the mystery of the incarnation, death, and resurrection of the Son of God.
Bearing in mind this article of faith, theology today, in its reflection on the existence of other religious experiences and on their meaning in God's salvific plan, is invited to explore if and in what way the historical figures and positive elements of these religions may fall within the divine plan of salvation. In this undertaking, theological research has a vast field of work under the guidance of the Church's Magisterium. The Second Vatican Council, in fact, has stated that: “the unique mediation of the Redeemer does not exclude, but rather gives rise to a manifold cooperation which is but a participation in this one source”.43 The content of this participated mediation should be explored more deeply, but must remain always consistent with the principle of Christ's unique mediation: “Although participated forms of mediation of different kinds and degrees are not excluded, they acquire meaning and value only from Christ's own mediation, and they cannot be understood as parallel or complementary to his”.44 Hence, those solutions that propose a salvific action of God beyond the unique mediation of Christ would be contrary to Christian and Catholic faith.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment