Once again Church Militant has denied the Catholic faith.Michael Voris has refused to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) or EENS according to the Patristic period or the missionaries in the 16th century.The Church Militant Staff did not want to be labelled 'legally not Catholic', by the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the SPLC and ADL.
The report NH Catholic College Slammed For Hosting Democratic Debate, which also refers to the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, quotes the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Outside the Church No Salvation 846) with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The report could have mentioned that CCC 846 does not exclude exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.There is no contradiction with the strict interpretation of EENS by St. Thomas Aquinas and St.Augustine.
CMTV needed to state with reference to CCC 846, that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to only hypothetical cases.So all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church and all need to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism(Ag 7) for salvation( to avoid Hell).Hypothetical cases cannot be obbjective exceptions to EENS in 2020.
Instead the report simply quoted a part of CCC 846 and left it at that.This would please liberals and the CDF.The report did not state that CCC 846 can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism; with a false premise or without it.This had to be made clear.
FR.THOMAS WEINANDY
It's like Fr. Thomas Weinandy, in a recent article vaguely wrote that the Church is one,holy and apostolic and left it at that.The liberals, traditionalists and sedevacantists can also say the same.
The Church is one, holy and apostolic would be the conclusion of Paulist Fr. Greg Apparcel c.s.p,chaplain for the mission and rector of St. Patrick’s / San Patrizio. The Paulist Fathers in Rome interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and then reject the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite). So they have a new version of EENS, it is EENS, Cushingite.
Non hypothetical and objective cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to traditional Feeneyite EENS, for the Paulists and the American congregation at this church.
For me also the Church is one, holy and apostolic and I affirm Feeneyite EENS and feeneyite Vatican Council II. I would interpret CCC 846 without the false premise, so BOD, BOB and I.I would remain hypothetical only.It would be the same with Feeneyite CCC 847 and 848 ( invincible ignorance).
The Church is one, holy and apostolic would be the conclusion of Paulist Fr. Greg Apparcel c.s.p,chaplain for the mission and rector of St. Patrick’s / San Patrizio. The Paulist Fathers in Rome interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and then reject the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite). So they have a new version of EENS, it is EENS, Cushingite.
Non hypothetical and objective cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to traditional Feeneyite EENS, for the Paulists and the American congregation at this church.
For me also the Church is one, holy and apostolic and I affirm Feeneyite EENS and feeneyite Vatican Council II. I would interpret CCC 846 without the false premise, so BOD, BOB and I.I would remain hypothetical only.It would be the same with Feeneyite CCC 847 and 848 ( invincible ignorance).
Fr. Weinandy could also have said that there is no known salvation outside the Church and there are only Catholics in Heaven.The hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are accepted( they can only be hypothetical) and are not objective exceptions to the dogma EENS. This would be saying that the Church is one, holy and apostolic and that Weinandy is no more a Cushingite, but a Feeneyite.Then we would know how Weinandy reasons and how he believes as a Catholic.He would be saying that Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) is not a rupture with Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. There is no hermeneutic of rupture with the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church no salvation), the Catechism of Pope Pius X (outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX(proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King etc). He would be affirming Tradition and rejecting Vatican Council II (Cushingite). His theological position would be Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center are correct and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) made an objective mistake.
We cannot see people saved in Heaven without faith and baptism and they cannot be physically seen on earth at the same time, to be exceptions, to EENS and the past ecclesiology.So when someone says there are visible exceptions to EENS he violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. The person saved outside the Church cannot be in two places at the same time.
Perhaps CMTV intentionally wanted things to remain vague and they did not want to pick up the persecution.
Perhaps CMTV intentionally wanted things to remain vague and they did not want to pick up the persecution.
Michael Voris probably reported on the St.Benedict Center issue in New Hampshire, as another good story and then had Jim Russell's report, 'Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney', posted on CMTV. Russell was Cushingite on EENS and Vatican Council II and did not consider this strange.
CMTV was also telling those who matter, that they are still Cushingite like most Catholics, and so are legally Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/catholic-college-to-host-democratic-debate
CMTV was also telling those who matter, that they are still Cushingite like most Catholics, and so are legally Catholic.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/catholic-college-to-host-democratic-debate
OCTOBER 30, 2019
Bishop Peter Libasci and the Chancellor want scientists in New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II by violating Newton's Laws of physics.This is a credibility issue.For a doctor, engineer, lawyer or priest to confuse what is invisible as being being visible, even after being informed, indicates his sense of reality is different from the rest of mankindhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bishop-peter-libasci-and-chancellor.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM, has to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and the laws of physics at the Newtonian level of matter, to be theologically acceptable for the CDF and Diocese of Manchester,USA.It is only then the Prohibitions 6 will be lifted against this Catholic religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, who are not sedevacantists and nor in schism with the past popes and saints on EENS or Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/brother-andre-marie-micm-has-to-violate.html
OCTOBER 25, 2019
Fr. Brian Harrison, Joseph Shaw, John Salza, John Lamont, Thomas Pink and others cannot say all need to enter the Catholic Church as members for salvation and not only those who know about Jesus and the Church. They cannot say this since they wrongly assume BOD, BOB and I.I 1 are objective examples of salvation outside the Church. It is the same for Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and his Chancellor.Their error comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston(LOHO) and the error was included in Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/fr-brian-harrison-joseph-shaw-john.html
JANUARY 12, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM brings de-railed Catholic theology back on line http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/brother-andre-marie-micm-brings-de.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
According to the laws of physics there are no exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) of the popes and saints over the centuries.So the New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism and New Evangelisation is a lot of nonsense.
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Such a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei, Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/such-staggering-thoughtall-those.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
The 16 books of Vatican Council II have an error. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. The Council Fathers misunderstood the laws of physics. They wrongly assumed the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) referred to physical bodies in time and space. They they created a new false theology based upon this irrationality. This cannot be magisterial but is human error. Since the Holy Spirit cannot make a factual and objective error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-16-books-of-vatican-council-ii-have.html
OCTOBER 28, 2019
All the books on Vatican Council II that have been published could probably have an error in the interpretation of the Council, in its 16 basic documents.Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate,Ad Gentes, Unitatitis Redintigratio, Gaudium et Specs etc were are all interpreted with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition. Hypotheticals were assumed to be objective people saved outside the Church.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-that.html
_____________________
_____________________
MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS CAN BE INTERPRETED WITH 1)THE RED PASSAGESBEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES OR WITH 2)THE RED PASSAGESNOT BEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES.THE LATTER(2) IS RATIONAL.
No comments:
Post a Comment