If Cardinal Raymond Burke affirmed extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) without hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance being exceptions to EENS they would ask him to leave the Church.
If he interprets Vatican Council II without invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II being visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so exceptions to EENS, the Syllabus, the Athanasius Creed etc - they would ask him to leave the Church.
This could be the reason why Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrist group are not talking-specifics.
They all criticize Vatican Council II in general.The liberals and the Vatican like it.Since they want Catholics to believe that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition.
This is false.
But no one is saying it.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment