In a recent report on LifeSite News, Maike Hickson calls Roberto dei Mattei a traditionalist.How can he be a traditionalist when he interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a rupture with Tradition ?
He interprets the Catechisms( all of them) also with the New Theology to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There is a rupture with EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine.
His interpretation of the Nicene Creed is different from mine and so is the Profession of Faith. He is a modernist and not traditionalist.
Is he being called a traditionalist only because he goes for the Latin Mass ? -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment