Fr.John Zuhlsdorf could ask to be incardinated in a diocese where the bishop interprets Vatican Council II without a false premise. He could demand it canonically. He could start ticking off all the dioceses which do not use the false premise, including the dioceses of Madison,USA and Velletri, Italy..- Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
The Rome Vicariate only grants incardination to liberal priests who reject the dogma EENS and interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and so change the meaning of the Nicene Creed. With the false premise they are also rejecting the the Athanasius Creed.They interpret all the Catechisms with the false premise creating heresy and schism. The Mass of these priests is considered licit. They would meet Peter Kwasniewski's critieria for explaining the Liturgy.Priests who offer the Latin Mass are also granted incardination when they meet the heretical and schismatic doctrinal requirements
The Rome Vicariate only grants incardination to liberal priests who reject the dogma EENS and interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and so change the meaning of the Nicene Creed. With the false premise they are also rejecting the the Athanasius Creed.They interpret all the Catechisms with the false premise creating heresy and schism. The Mass of these priests is considered licit. They would meet Peter Kwasniewski's critieria for explaining the Liturgy.Priests who offer the Latin Mass are also granted incardination when they meet the heretical and schismatic doctrinal requirements.-Lionel Andrades
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-four-qualities-of-liturgy-validity.html
MONDAY, JUNE 8, 2015
Can a priest be faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church, affirm Vatican Council II interpreted according to Feeneyism and not choose incardination ?
Vatican/Vicariate is not allowing priests in Rome to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism : incardìnation prohibition
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2020
Peter Kwasniewski like the present two popes, interprets the Creeds with the false premise, rejects exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and with this first class heresy and public schism,goes up to receive the Eucharist kneeling and on the tongue at Mass in Latin, with the priest not facing the congregation, then he considers the liturgy licit, fitting, authentic and valid
Peter Kwasniewski like the present two popes, interprets the Creeds with the false premise, rejects exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and with this first class heresy and public schism,goes up to receive the Eucharist kneeling and on the tongue at Mass in Latin, with the priest not facing the congregation, then he considers the liturgy licit, fitting, authentic and valid. -Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 17, 2020
Peter Kwasniewski goes for a Latin Mass (not TLM) permitted by the Cushingite Vatican, where the priests and congregation affirm the New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism etc all created with a false premise
NOVEMBER 17, 2020
Peter Kwasniewski attends a valid, licit, fitting and authentic Latin Mass in which the priest is forced to affirm Cushingite doctrines, which are heretical and schismatic. They are officially approved by the present two popes, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Cardinal Robert Sarah's Congregation for Divine Worship, Vatican
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
If the SSPX would announce that they accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise their Mass would be doctrinally licit for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Congregation for Divine Liturgy, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis, cardinals and bishops and Peter Kwasniewski
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
The Mass of Kiko Arguello's New Catechumenal Way is licit since the priest is Christocentric and not Ecclesiocentric like at the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16th century. The Mass of the Way is licit for the Vatican and it would also be licit and authentic for Peter Kwasniewski
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
Michael Matt attends Mass in Latin at a church in the USA where the priest accepts Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise and he also re-interprets the Creeds and Catechisms non traditionally. This is approved by the USCCB.They consider this Mass licit and without impediments even though the theology is heretical and schismatic and a rupture with the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century and also the Byzantine Greek Mass of the third century. For Peter Kwasniewski this is authentic and fitting liturgy
NOVEMBER 1, 2020
An FSSP priest could offer the Novus Ordo Mass in Italian and interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II without the false premise and so there would not be a change in the First Commandment while another FSSP priest could offer the Latin Mass while intepreting the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II with the false premise creating first class heresy and an impediment to offering Holy Mass.This Latin Mass would still be valid, licit, fitting and authentic for Peter Kwasniewski
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
When the FSSP priest rejects the Athanasiius Creed and changes the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed it is an impediment to offering Holy Mass, for example, at the church Santissima Trinita dei Pelligrini, Rome. Yet for Peter Kwasniewski this Mass in Latin could be valid, licit , fitting and authentic
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
Peter Kwasniewski considers Holy Mass valid, licit , fitting and authentic when the priest and congregation change the traditional interpretation of the Creeds , Catechisms and interpret also Vatican Council II with a false premise.This break with Tradition and the resulting heresy and schism officially approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the popes, is valid, licit , fitting and authentic for him.
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
Peter Kwasniewski even after being informed will not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise. LG 16 refers to invisible or visible cases in 2020 for him ? No answer. LG 8 in Vatican Council II refers to an objective person or a hypothetical case in 2020 for him ? No answer. Could he interpret theoretical cases of UR 3 as not contradicting the old ecumenism of return ? No answer. He does not want to answer
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-four-qualities-of-liturgy-validity.html |
NOVEMBER 15, 2020
If the SSPX would announce that they accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise their Mass would be doctrinally licit for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Congregation for Divine Liturgy, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis, cardinals and bishops and Peter Kwasniewski
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2017
Lay Catholics do not know about Vatican Council II,Feeneyite since popes, cardinals, bishops, priests and traditionalists are silent : afraid of persecution from the Left who represent Satan
The late Fr.Nicholas Gruner affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus but he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.He had problems with incardination. He was opposed by cardinals and bishops who could only accept Vatican Council II(Cushingism).He would reject Vatican Council II (Cushingism) which was the only interpretation of the Council he knew.
I correspond with a lay Catholic who lives in an FSSP community in the USA.He knows what I am saying and agrees with me but he cannot make a lone stand in his parish.Every one there are Cushingites.They cite the popes since Pius XII.All were Cushingites.The FSSP priests cannot accept that Pope Pius XII made an objective error with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. He supported heresy in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
Well, even if they wanted to accept this, there is no choice.They cannot.I can sympathize with this lay Catholic.It is the same in my parish here.
Even the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney in the USA have had it wrong.The Catholic religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary supported Fr.Nicholas Gruner, however they too, only knew of a Vatican Council II,Cushingite.Were Brother Francis Maluf MICM and Fr.Leonard Feeney also Cushingites with reference to Vatican Council II ? I don't know.
No comments:
Post a Comment