MAY 7, 2021
There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.They agree with me!
There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.They agree with me!They agree with me, when I write that Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Catechisms etc, since they interpret them with the false premise, instead of without it, they use the irrational red passages instead of the rational blue ones, so they create an artificial hermeneutic of rupture when there really is a continuity with Tradition if they would avoid the false premise, inference and conclusion.
So Bishop Robert Barron received the million dollar Templeton Foundation since he used the false premise to interpret Vatcian Council II.
Prof. Alberto Melloni would not continue to receive a million euros from the Italian government, if he had used the blue passages to interpret Vatican Council II.
Ralph Martin remains on the Vatican offices for the New Evangelisation since he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, which is not Magisterial.This was approved by Pope Benedict.
The Holy Spirit guides the teaching authority of the Catholic Church and we refer to this as the Magisterium.
The Holy Spirit cannot guide the Church to choose a false premise and make an objective error in observation, which results in a break with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church and a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms and Tradition in general. There cannot be a development of doctrine based upon a fake premise. This is deception or human error.It is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 14, 2021
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not magisterial on Vatican Council II since they interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational option
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not magisterial on Vatican Council II since they interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion ( red passages below) instead of the rational option( blue passages below).
To be Magisterial they need to interpret Vatican Council II with 'the blue passages'.
The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake and choose 'the red passages'. -Lionel Andrades
Fake premise
APRIL 13, 2021
The Department of Theology at the Pontifical University St. John Lateran, Rome have been informed that there are two options in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and they are using the irrational one
APRIL 13, 2021
The faculty at the Augustine Institute, Graduate School, Colorado interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Catholic orthodoxy and then they claim on their website that they teach orthodoxy
APRIL 13, 2021
There are articles/reports on Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise on the website of the traditionalists. They are there on the websites of the Most Holy Family Monastery, Catholicism.org,Most Holy Trinity Seminary,Novus Ordo Watch, Rorate Caeili, Remnant News, Correspondenza Romano etc. They need to be corrected
APRIL 13, 2021
Repost : Padre Pio Prayer Groups, Neo Catechumenal Way, Charismatic Renewal, all the religious communities, Diocesan priests... the SSPX Archbishop Gerhard Muller and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia
APRIL 13, 2021
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican is not magisterial on Vatican Council II since he interprets the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational and traditional option, in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-prefect-of_13.html
APRIL 13, 2021
Bishop Steven J.Lopes interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion.He would also be interpreting the Creeds and Catechisms with the same irrationality. This is an irregular issue. It is a canonical issue : he excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco for supporting Tradition and opposing the false interpretation of Vatican Council II
APRIL 13, 2021
All the books on Vatican Council II on display at the Society of St. Pius X (Fraternita Sacerdotale San Pio X) center in Albano, Italy are written with the false premise. New books need to be written on the Council, interpreted without the irrational premise, inference and conclusion https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-on.html
APRIL 12, 2021
Repost . The red is not an exception to the blue' : new extraordinary understanding of Vatican Council II
APRIL 12, 2021
Feeneyites do not have to deny the baptism of desire since BOD is always invisible and hypothetical, it never was a practical exception to EENS
APRIL 12, 2021
Most of the material on Vatican Council II at the office of Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State and also at the library of the St. John Lateran University, Rome, is now obsolete
APRIL 12, 2021
Most of the material on Vatican Council II on the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA website is now obsolete. It is the same for the Vatican websites
APRIL 12, 2021
Most of the material on Vatican Council II on the SSPX websites is now obsolete
APRIL 11, 2021
There is the Augustine Institute, Graduate School in Colorado, USA and there is the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, at the St. Benedict Center,New Hampshire,USA. I would recommend the latter
APRIL 11, 2021
Fr. Leonard Feeney, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Archbishop Pierre Thuc did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the false premise, inference and conclusion
APRIL 10, 2021
All these years the main line media in the USA and Europe have criticized Lefebvre and Feeney. What will they now do when they discover that Vatican Council II supports the two traditionalists ?
APRIL 9, 2021
Why should the readers of the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM) website interpret Vatican Council II like Michael and Peter Dimond and not like me ?
APRIL 9, 2021
The interpretation of Magisterial documents by the present two popes would be different from that of the popes before 1930,who did not use the false premise. The popes at that time were Feeneyites. Today they are Cushingites
APRIL 9, 2021
It was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney : Vatican Council II is in harmony with 16th century EENS. There is no ' development of doctrine'
APRIL 8, 2021
Repost : The Boston Heresy Case refers historic magisterial heresy in the Catholic Church
APRIL 8, 2021
Without the irrational premise the Council supports Tradition and the suspended priests. The Council without the false premise supports the priests and not the bishops : Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy and Mons. Luigi Negri
APRIL 7, 2021
If Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise in 1965 there would be no liberal-traditionalist division in the Catholic Church today
APRIL 7, 2021
Repost : Robert Kennedy asked Richard Cushing to suppress Fr. Leonard Feeney
APRIL 6, 2021
When it is said that Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Catholic Tradition, this is a conclusion. The premise is that there are physically visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance.Otherwise there could not be exceptions. But this is a false premise
MARCH 14, 2021
So why did Vatican Council II mention salvation outside the Church, when there is no known salvation outside the Church?
MAY 4, 2021
Pope Francis' message on Catechetics is based upon the non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( CCC 845,846,1257 etc). If he did not use the false premise, the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church would be the same before and after Vatican Council II and so would Catechetics
APRIL 14, 2021
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not magisterial on Vatican Council II since they interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational option. They are also not magisterial on the Nicene and Apostles Creed since they make the same mistake which can be avoided
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not magisterial on Vatican Council II since they interpret the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational option.1
How do you interpret the Apostles Creed at Holy Mass ?
There are two options, one rational and the other irrational, one traditional and the other non traditional, one heretical and the other non heretical, one schismatic and the other not a rupture with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church. Most Catholics choose the irrational version which is not prohibited by the popes, cardinals and bishops.
" I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" - Apostles Creed
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict
1. Do you say in church, at Holy Mass when the Creed is prayed, " I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" and mean that the Holy Spirit guides the Church today to teach that outside the Catholic Church there is salvation, known salvation, there are visible non Catholics saved without faith and the baptism of water and so there is no communion with the saints on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed etc ?
Or,
Lionel:
2. Do you say in church at Mass , "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" and then mean that the Holy Spirit guides the Church today to teach that outside the Church there is no known salvation, there are no physically visible non Catholics in 2021 saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and so there is communion with the saints - Francis of Assisi, Ignatius of Loyola, Francis Xavier, Catherine of Siena, Maximillian Kolbe etc - on extra ecclesiam nulla salus( with no exceptions, like in the 16th century) the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be Catholic for salvation, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return), Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI on the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation etc ?
THERE ARE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE NICENE CREED. WHICH ONE IS YOURS ?
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins - Nicene Creed
Lionel :
1. There is one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water. It is physically visible and repeatable.
Or.
For Pope Francis and Pope Benedict
2.There are more than three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, they are known baptisms, personally visible. They are the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance. They exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and so are practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as explained in the Letter of the Holy Office(CDF) 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. It was referenced also in Vatican Council II(Lumen Gentium 16).
When Pope Francis and Pope Benedict avoid the false premise, inference and conclusion their interpretation of the Creeds will be Magisterial and in harmony with the past Magisterium. There would be no hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/pope-francis-and-pope-benedict-are-not_14.html
_______________________
MAY 6, 2021
The Vatican's Congregation for Catholic Education has approved political theology, bad theology.Since the Left wants it for the Catholic Church
____________________
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/there-is-no-denial-from-congregation.html
No comments:
Post a Comment