There is a major error in Vatican Council II and in this sense the Council cannot be Magisterial.The Council Fathers considered hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being non hypothetical, objective examples of salvation outside the Church( without faith and the baptism of water) and practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO). They concluded like the LOHO, that every one does not need to be a formal member of the Catholic Church.
So Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and also mentions invincible ignorance as if it is an exception, for EENS, or relevant to EENS.
Similarly Lumen Gentium 14 says the Church is necessary for salvation but mentions the baptism of desire, as if it is an exception.
DEADWOOD, EMPTIES
Now if the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are read, and pictured as always being theoretical, and so are not exceptions to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church,we have a rational and traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14 etc). BOD and I.I are seen as deadwood, ‘ a null set’, empties.
But because of the formal error which the Council Fathers picked up from the LOHO, and which was not corrected by the popes, there are today two interpretations of Vatican Council II.
1) With the false premise which cannot be Magisterial.
2) Without the fake premise which does not contradict the past Magisterium and Tradition and so is Magisterial on EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc.
The excommunication was maintained for some 19 years as Pope Pius XII, Pope John XIII, Pope Paul VI would accept the irrational observation which made the dogma EENS obsolete.
Now when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise of some 80 years, it cannot me Magisterial.He has to choose the rational premise, the rational inference and traditional conclusion.Since then the Council will be in harmony with the past Magisterium on EENS etc.
Inspite of the initial error of the Council Fathers,and the subsequent popes, Pope Francis can interpret the Council in harmony with EENS and the past Magisterium.-Lionel Andrades
t
Promotore dell'interpretazione di Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Per lui il Concilio è dogmatico e non solo pastorale.
Scrittore sulla scoperta delle due interpretazioni del Concilio Vaticano II, l'una razionale e l'altra irrazionale, si interpreta l'una con la falsa premessa e l'altra senza. Uno è Magistrale e l'altro, quello comune, è non Magistrale.
Lo stesso vale per i Credo ei Catechismi.
Ci possono essere due interpretazioni.
Perché i cattolici dovrebbero scegliere una versione irrazionale che è eretica, non tradizionale e scismatica, quando c'è un'opzione razionale che è tradizionale?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
AUGUST 4, 2021
Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
________________
No comments:
Post a Comment