So
we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius
of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier. All non Catholics are
oriented to Hell according to Bishop Athanasius Schneider and not only those ‘who
know’ about Jesus and the Church(LG 14) – since invincible ignorance is no more
a practical exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).All in general need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7) and if there are any exceptions of those 'who know' or 'do not know' it could only be known to God.So there are no known practical exceptions for the Great Commission.
The
Council Fathers (1965) made an objective error when they projected the baptism of desire(LG 14) as an exception
to EENS according to Loyola, Bellarmine and Xavier.This mistake was there in
the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the
Archbishop of Boston(LOHO).Pope Benedict needs to issue a correction and
apologise. Since his New Theology is based upon the false premise of the LOHO.
The
false premise of Pope Benedict is now a theological virus that has spread in
the Catholic Church, like an epidemic. He has to end it.He must correct Pope
Francis’ mistake, which is also that of the College of Cardinals.
Pope
Benedict needs to tell Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II
have got the ‘virus’ and so are useless.They were made irrelevant with the
error. Also Pope Benedict’s books on Ecclesiology published by Ignatius Press,
and in the many German editions, have to
be phased out. The pontifical universities must note the error in the books on
Ecclesiology, written also by Semeraro, Kasper and Forte.
Pope
Benedict wanted the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to keep interpreting the
baptism of desire(LG 14) as referring to to literal cases, presently known to
us. So they would have to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 14 etc) in
principle, by confusing invisible cases as being physically visible. Then with
this irrationality they would have to accept the hermeneutic of rupture with
Tradition, which would follow with the use of the false premise. It was only
with this doctrinal and theological error, was he prepared to grant the SSPX
canonical recognition.Pope Francis needs to apologise.
Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 14 being
a literal example of salvation outside the Church in the present times and
Bishop Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall are saying there are no literal cases
of the baptism of desire in 1965-2021.
Bishop
Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall are avoiding the fake premise ( invisible
people are visible in the present times) and Pope Benedict and Pope Francis
have to use it to create a break with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
If
the popes choose the rational premise ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved
outside the Church in 2021 are invisible) then they would be saying that in
Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,
UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc do not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the
Catholic Church, opposed by the Left.-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 28, 2021
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no
known literal cases of the baptism of desire in our human reality but Cardinal
Ratzinger wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus with there being literally
known cases of being saved with the baptism of desire
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said_28.html
No comments:
Post a Comment