Pope Benedict in an interview with the daily Avvenire said that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.There was ‘a development’ with Vatican Council II.He meant Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 being literal cases in 1965-2021.So EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed were made obsolete.
But with LG 14 (baptism of desire) not being a literal case in 2021 for Schneider and Marshall, the game has changed. It is the popes are using the wrong interpretation of the Council.So they are choosing the hermeneutic of rupture with the past.
When in principle, hypothetical cases (LG 8,Lg 14,LG 16 ,UR 3 etc) are not literal and personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times,then the popes and the SSPX, can affirm Vatican Council II ( with the rational premise) and also Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).They would not be in a rupture with the past Magisterium.They would be supporting Vatican Council II, Tradition and the past Magisterium.
Pope Francis is in schism since he rejects Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and rejects Tradition ( Catechism of Pope Pius X,24Q,27Q etc), with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He produces the hermeneutic of rupture with the Early Christians, the early Catholics, the Fathers of the Church, the Medieval Fathers and the popes before Pius XII.
Now the entire College of Cardinals are in a factory-made, artificial schism with their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II ( visible LG 14 cases).
Dr.Taylor Marshall could have asked, « Is Cardinal Marx in schism because of his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II ? ».
The “Ecclesia Dei” communities meeting, with Pope Francis this month, as reported on the website of Taylor Marshall, would be of no value for the traditionalists.They need to discuss Vatican Council II, interpreted with the rational premise( invisible cases of LG 14 in 2021 are always invisible).More important, affirm it before the pope.
FSSP,ICKSP,IBP
The FSSP (Fraternity of St Peter), ICKSP
(Institute of Christ the King), and IBP (Institute of the Good
Shepherd),interpretation of Vatican Council II is as schismatic as that of Pope
Francis. They all use the false premise which Bishop Schneider avoided.
These communities need to tell Pope Francis to
interpret the Council rationally,come back to the Church and take the Catholic
Church back to Tradition at all rites and liturgies.
They should mention that the SSPX-Vatican talks
during the pontificate of Pope Benedict,were a waste of time.Since both sides
were interpreting the Council with LG 14 ( baptism of desire) referring to
literal and objective cases.Fr.Jean Marie Gleize and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj are
still at it. –Lionel
Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of
Vatican Council II.For him the Council is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations
of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is
interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial
and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.
There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version
which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is
there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment