Raymond Arroyo asks Bishop Athanasius Schneider how can there be a renewal in the Church?
I cannot see a renewal with
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s theology.It is based upon the False Premise. It is the same with the liberals.We cannot ‘unite the clans’ with liberalism.There cannot be unity with Cushingite theology. This is the
theology of the traditionalists approved by the Left.
The Left controls the churches of the
Catholic Church in Rome with Government approved Committees.Also the police are
there at Holy Mass, most of them non Christians.So if a priest does not affirm
liberalism created with the False Premise which produces a break with
Tradition, he has his incardination cancelled by the Rome Vicarate or he could be transferred.
So all the FSSP priests at the church
Trinita dei Pellegrini, Rome, for example, offer Mass in Latin, with the fake
theology.Cardinal Raymond Burke and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf are allowed to offer
Holy Mass there or elsewhere in Rome, only because they affirm the common fake
theology created with the False Premise.This is the theology of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
The SSPX priests at their St.Catherine
of Siene chapel in Rome also interpret Vatican Council II, EENS etc with the
Fake Premise. The police are there to control them.
So the priests do not say that they interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and so accept the Council in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions) and the Athanasius Creed ( with no known exceptions). They are politically correct for the police.It is the same at the Novus Ordo Mass in Rome.
For a renewal in the Catholic Church we need to interpret all Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Writer on Vatican Council II being dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius Creed etc.
It is found that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other irrational. Since one uses a Rational Premise and the other a False Premise.One is Magisterial with the past Magisterium and the other, the common one, has an objective error and so cannot be Magisterial.It is the same with the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose the irrational version which is heretical, non traditional, liberal and schismatic, while a rational option is there, which is traditional ?.
__________________
No comments:
Post a Comment