Pope Paul VI interpreted
Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise and
this was the smoke of Satan. All the popes who followed, repeated the mistake.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican still does not correct
the error.
It was Pope Pius XII who
interpreted the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with the Fake
Premise instead of the Rational Premise, in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
Pope John XXIII and Pope
John Paul I, did not correct the mistake when they were cardinals, and neither
when they were popes.
When Vatican Council II
is interpreted with the Rational Premise then the Church returns to the past
theology and ecclesiology. Since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are
not practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors
( with no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed, outside the Church there is no
salvation ( with no exceptions), the Catechism of Pope Pius X, (24Q,27Q),outside
the Church there is no salvation ( with no exceptions).
Pope Paul VI also did not correct the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.That Letter influenced Vatican Council II and changed the theology in the Catholic Church.
Today Cardinal Godfried Daneels and Roberto dei
Mattei interpret Vatican Council II with the same
Fake Premise and so there are exceptions for the
Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed etc, which
were interpreted with no known exceptions, before the 1940’s.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment