The Jesuits in Rome are using the fake premise to
interpret Vatican Council II and so avoid being labelled ‘extremist’ by the
Leftist Administration here. Also their Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius Loyola,
this summer in Italy are based upon Church documents interpreted with the
irrational premise, inference and conclusion. So there is a theological and
doctrinal rupture with St. Ignatius of Loyola’s concept of their being
exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
It is unethical and dishonest for the Jesuits to interpret
Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, baptism of desire, invincible
ignorance and the baptism of blood and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a fake
premise and suggest that they are following St. Ignatius of Loyola.
FAKE PREMISE OF THE JESUITS IN ROME
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
FAKE INFERENCE OF THE JESUITS IN ROME
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
FAKE CONCLUSION OF THE JESUITS IN ROME
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
RATIONAL PREMISE OF LIONEL ANDRADES
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
RATIONAL INFERENCE OF LIONEL ANDRADES
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
RATIONAL CONCLUSION OF LIONEL ANDRADES
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake it used the false premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
_____________________
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...- Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II