When someone affirms the strict
interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla
salus (EENS) it does not mean that he rejects Vatican Council II but that he is only seeing
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical cases in 2022
and so are not practical exceptions for EENS.
So a Catholic does not have to reject
the baptism of desire (BOD), invincible ignorance (I.I) and the baptism of blood
(BOB) to be a Feeneyite.
BOD, BOB and I.I are not a problem for a
Feeneyite since they refer to invisible cases.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made
an objective error when it projected unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as being
objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
The Lefebvrists and liberals still see
BOD, BOB and I.I as being objective and visible cases and so reject Feeneyite EENS.
The popes and saints when they were
asked about BOD, BOB and I.I were referring to hypothetical cases. This is
common sense.
However the Lefebvrists and liberals
re-interpret the popes and saints wrongly. They assume that St.Anthony Marie
Claret, St. Thomas Aquinas and St.Robert Bellarmine were referring to visible
cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. This is using the False Premise instead of the
Rational Premise to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I, wrongly.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
Catholics can interpret Vatican Council II with BOD, BOB and I.I Cushingite or Feeneyite
What are we defending Vatican Council II any more for ?
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment