-Lionel Andrades
John
Salza and the Lefebvrists use the False and not Rational Premise to interpret
Vatican Council II. In this way they remain politically correct. They are
Cushingites and not Feeneyites.
Similarly the SSPX and the sedevacantists CMRI and Bishop Donald Sanborn’s seminary in Florida,USA, to maintain their tax exemption, status and other financial benefits are not affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Vatican Council II interpreted with the
Rational Premise supports the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholci Church.Since there are no exceptions in the text of the Council for the
Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.
Instead
the web blog Rorate Caeili, bloggers Fr. John Zuhsldorf. Louie Verrechio, and
others who attend/offer the Latin Mass, choose to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,
UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. in Vatican Council II as being a rupture with the
Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. So
they have to project LG 8 etc. as being physically visible cases and known
Catholics saved outside the Church.
This
is irrational and not Catholic.
Invisible
people cannot be visible exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism.
With this False Premise they create a break with Tradition and remain approved
by the Left. There is no threat to their income, via taxes or blog earnings.
John Salza continues with his career. He is a Lefebvrist-Cushingite who maintains invisible people are visible in 2022.He is not a Feeneyite who says invisible cases are invisible in 2022.
So Salza’s interpretation of Vatican Council II is
political and nontraditional. It is irrational but it allows the money to keep
coming.
John Salza like the Lefebvrists traditionalists
(SSPX) and Feeneyite traditionalists (St.
Benedict Center, Still River, MA, USA) find
Cushingism, with the False Premise helps them in
a worldly way.
They are Cushingites like their
liberal
bishops, and the USCCB in general.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment