DECEMBER 19, 2021
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj must announce that all cardinals, bishops, parish priests, rectors and religious sisters must interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the Irrational Premise, as suggested by Traditionis Custode
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj,must announce that all cardinals, bishops, parish priests, rectors and religious sisters must interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the Irrational Premise, as suggested by Traditionis Custode.Morally Catholics should not be expected to use a False Premise when a rational alternative is available which is traditional and non schismatic and non heretical.
Traditionis Custode creates division on the Eucharist it supports sacrilege and scandal when it changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise.This creates the New Theology. The New Theology and the old theology are related to who receives the Eucharist. Traditionis Custode interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and then it is cited for giving the Eucharist to the divorced and re-married, Protestants and non Christians.
Traditionis Custode promotes ecclesial division on the Eucharist with the Fake Premise. The laity are obliged to reject it and ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This would be Magisterial.They now have a choice.
The past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church is made obsolete with the use of the Fake Premise.The reasoning of the Fake Premise is invisible people are physically visible in 1965-2021. Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance), for example, becomes an example of visible salvation outside the Church.So it is claimed that there are practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc).
So now when a bishop, Parish Priest or Rector, interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise and gives the Eucharist to non Christians, the laity must know, that he really interprets the Council II irrationally, with the Fake Premise.He also expects them to do the same. This is the message of Traditionis Custode.It interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and creates ecclesial division on the Eucharist.
They must ask the bishops, Parish Priests and Rectors, to reject Traditionis Custode and interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, this would be Magisterial.They could also ask Pope Francis to do the same. -Lionel Andrades
, DECEMBER 19, 2021
Eucharistic 'reforms' with Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise according to Traitionis Custode
DECEMBER 19, 2021
Traditionis Custode creates division on the Eucharist it supports sacrilege and scandal when it changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise to produce political liberalism in the Church.
DECEMBER 18, 2021
Traditionis Custode uses the false premise. Catholics are not obliged to follow it. It is immoral and unethical.This is ecclesial division
DECEMBER 18, 2021
DECEMBER 18, 2021
The interpretation of Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise is approved by the Left. It is ideological.It is not Catholic.It cannot be Magisterial since it is based upon an objective error which can still be avoided today
DECEMBER 16, 2021
In Traditionis Custode Vatican Council II is interpreted without the Rational Premise
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
Pope Francis, Cardinal Angelo Donatis and Archbishop Arthur Roche maintain restrictions on the Latin Mass based upon their interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False, Irrational Premise
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
Archbishop Arthur Roche refers to the old and new Magisterium with reference to Vatican Council II and the Latin Mass.But now we know that there is a Ratonal and Irrational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Roche is using the Fake Premise to create a ‘new magisterium’.
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
No comments:
Post a Comment