Cardinal Angelo Donatis, the Vicar
General in Rome interprets Magisterial Documents ( Vatican Council II etc) with
a Fake Premise and then welcomes a Fake Rupture with the exclusivist theology
of the Roman Missal ( 1580) . He has banned this Missal and the Latin Mass in
Rome for the Easter Triduum.
This Good Friday there will be no Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews, who die without ‘faith and baptism’ (Ad Gentes 7), which is needed by all non Christians, for salvation from Hell with the lake of fire.
The Catholic laity must still request
the Vicariate in Rome to kindly re-interpret Vatican Council II, but with a Rational
Premise (invisible people are invisible). Then there will be the old link with
Catholic Tradition. It will give the green light for the laity to affirm
the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,
27Q).It is then that the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in
all politics ( Quas Primas), will make sense.
AMORIS LAETITIA WAS BASED UPON THE UNETHICAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II
Pope Francis like Cardinal Donatis has
used the unethical interpretation of Vatican Council II to justify Amoris
Laetitia and the Abu Dhabi Statement. In the sense that Vatican Council II (
Irrational) can produce practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of
the Church.So then why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and
remarried and why cannot we expect all non Catholics, in general, to go to
Heaven without Catholic faith and the baptism of water? This is irrational
reasoning and it is expressed in Vatican Council II (Rational).
VATICAN COUNCIL II ( RATIONAL) CREATES UNITY AND ENDS SCHISM
Vatican Council II (Rational) does not
have any practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. LG 8,
LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases
and not objective and known non Catholics, saved without faith and baptism, in
2022.So the pope can no more use the Council (irrational) to justify his heresy
and schism.
At the Legion of Christ university and
seminary in Rome, where I studied ( UPRA/PIMME) they interpret Magisterial
Documents with the False Premise.The faculty still today call it ‘keeping
in step with the Church’. Students who do not this are not allowed to sit for
the Final Comprehension Examination.They are also out of step for an
academic degree from the university. They cannot stay at the seminary (PIMME).
AT ALL THE CHURCHES IN ROME THEY USE THE FALSE PREMISE
At all the churches in Rome, Vatican Council II is being given to the people with the False Premise. Then it was said by the Prefects of the CDF (Ratzinger, Muller, Ladaria) that there practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
I accept all Magisterial Documents but I
interpret them rationally unlike the rest of the laity in Italy-unlike all the
religious communities in Rome.
I do not confuse what is subjective as
being objective and what is invisible as being visible, as they do.
Confusing what is implicit as being
explicit is the official mistake of Cardinal Angelo Donatis and his auxiliary
bishops at the Rome Vicariate.It is also the public mistake of Cardinal Luiz
Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), who
works at the Vatican and in Rome.
CARDINAL BURKE DOES NOT SEE HIS BIAS(CONFUSING WHAT IS INVISIBLE AS BEING VISIBLE)
I attend Holy Mass in Italian or Latin
and I do not interpret Vatican Council II like Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke who
lives in Rome. He uses the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and sees before him a False Rupture with Vatican Council II (Rational).He then runs down
Vatican Council II (Irrational) blinded by his error. He does not see this specific error in
the Council-text because of his bias(confusing what is invisible as being visible). The FSSP priests at their church in Rome, where Cardinal Donatis
has placed a ban for the Easter Triduum, do the same.
I AM NOT PROCLAIMING ANY THING NEW
I am not proclaiming anything new but
they are innovative and non-traditional and in the majority with the common
error. So I seem different.
They use a False Premise and bring out
an artificial and calculated rupture with Tradition. I avoid it with a
reasoning which takes me back to the old traditional ecclesiology of the Church.
I AM NOT CREATING A NEW THEOLOGY
I am not creating a new theology. I am only putting away the False Premise.It has created the New Theology (with
practical exceptions for EENS), upon which Donatis and Ladaria depend upon, for
their liberalism.
So they have limited freedom of religion
and worship given to them by the Leftist government in Italy, which supports
Satanic values. May be they feel that if they do not create the False Rupture
with Tradition, they will lose their freedom in Italy.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment