Bishop Peter Libasci,
Fr. Georges de Laire and Damien Fischer in the diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire,
USA are not being asked to affirm Vatican Council II interpreted with the
Rational Premise only and then they will have to affirm the strict
interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla
salus (EENS) , like Brother Andre Marie micm and the St. Benedict Center,
NH.
Brother Andre Marie
interprets Vatican Council II and EENS (baptism of desire etc) with the Rational
Premise and so there are no practical exceptions in the Council-text for the
past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. There is no break with the past
exclusivist ecclesiology.
But the Curia in
Manchester, including the Director of Education, Mary Ellen Mohan, is interpreting
Vatican Council II with the False Premise, like the rest of the Curia. This is
dishonest.
With the irrationality,
there is alleged known salvation outside the Church, there are are supposedly visible cases of
known Catholics saved outside the Church, who are projected as exceptions for
the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.
This is the irrationality accepted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith for all religious communities and Catholics in the diocese. Judge Andre K. Johnstone, U.S Magistrate Judge for the District Court in New Hampshire, who is hearing a case filed by Fr. Georges de Laire, could ask him if he affirms the same strict interpretation of the dogma EENS as the St. Benedict Center,i.e, if he did not use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. Also the Christopher White correspondent of the National Catholic Reporter and Damien Fischer would agree that they interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and so hold the same strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, for which Fr. Georges de Laire has imposed severe prohibitions on the Catholic religious community in New Hampshire, but not on Fischer or Catholics in the judiciary.
A judicial vicar who interprets Vatican Council II with a False Premise to avoid a Decree of Prohibitions is unethical.He has no right to decide marriage cases in the diocesan tribunal. Also after the scandal is brought to light he still will not interpret Vatican Council II honestly and affirm the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma EENS, as a Catholic in good standing.-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 30, 2019
Bishop Peter Libasci and the Chancellor want scientists in New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II by violating Newton's Laws of physics.This is a credibility issue.For a doctor, engineer, lawyer or priest to confuse what is invisible as being being visible, even after being informed, indicates his sense of reality is different from the rest of mankind.
and Emergency Medical Services, who interpret Vatican Council II with this irrationality.This is unprofessional for the police department and other professionals.
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM, has to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and the laws of physics at the Newtonian level of matter, to be theologically acceptable for the CDF and Diocese of Manchester,USA.It is only then the Prohibitions 6 will be lifted against this Catholic religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, who are not sedevacantists and nor in schism with the past popes and saints on EENS or Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/brother-andre-marie-micm-has-to-violate.html
JUNE 10, 2020
Diocese of Manchester, USA and CDF grant canonical status for religious communities which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion
1
REPOSTS
No comments:
Post a Comment