Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Lefebre the truth.
They did not tell him that if
he interpreted Lumen Gentium (8, 14 and 16) as being only hypothetical in the
present times, the Council would support Tradition and not progressivism. This
would be a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Instead they excommunicated
him.
Pope Paul VI also did not tell
Archbishop Lefebvre that if he rejected the objective mistake in the Letter of
the Holy Office 1949 and re-interpreted the baptism of desire (BOD) and
invincible ignorance (I.I) rationally, there would be nothing in the
Council-text to contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and,
the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
This changes the
interpretation of the Council. He was not informed. He died excommunicated.
The SSPX bishops are still not
informed about Vatican Council II( Rational) as a choice, in their dialogue
with Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith, who retires next month.
When Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism
of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) refer to hypothetical
cases in 2022 then they cannot be practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed
(all need to be members of the Church for salvation from Hell).This is
something obvious. There are not practical exceptions. You don’t have an
academic degree in theology to understand this.
When Unitatis Redintigratio 3,
the Decree on Ecumenim, in Vatican Council II, refers to unknown and
speculative cases in 2022, saved in ‘imperfect communion with the Church’, then
they are not practical exceptions for EENS and an ecumenism of return to the
Catholic Church, for salvation from Hell. Since there are no objective exceptions
for EENS. If anyone is saved outside the Church it can only be known to God.
The norm for salvation is Catholic Faith and the baptism of water. So with
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally we are back to the old ecumenism of
return to the Church.
When Ad Gentes 7 says all need
faith and baptism for salvation, supporting traditional EENS, then the baptism
of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions.
So we are back to traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in only
the Catholic Church. So Traditional Mission has not been changed with Vatican
Council II.Ad Gentes 7 is not contradicted by unknown and speculative cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
So with Vatican Council II (Rational)
we are back to the old ecclesiology but Archbishop Lefebvre did not know this
and he put the blame in general on Vatican Council II (Irrational). There was
no reason for many Catholic communities at that time to go into sedevacantism,
since the Council interpreted rationally was traditional. Many priests and nuns
gave up their vocation, since Pope Paul VI and the cardinals did not tell them
about the Council interpreted rationally.
If what is hypothetical is
just seen as being hypothetical (GS 22, NA 2, LG 8 etc) in 2022 then Vatican
Council II is not a break with Tradition. The Council affirms 16th century EENS
with Ad Gentes 7 (all need to enter the Church for salvation) and Lumen
Gentium, Unitatis Redintigratio etc, not being objective exceptions for Ad
Gentes 7 and Feeneyite EENS.
So Pope Francis and Pope
Benedict, like Pope Paul VI, could not be Magisterial when they today interpret
Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise.They must only use the Rational Premise. The bishops must only use the Rational Premise in the diocese.
Also Cardinal Luiz Ladaria is
not Magisterial when he interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the
Catholic Church with a False and not Rational Premise. He was not Magisterial
when he demanded that the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the
St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, do the same. They are obligated in
conscience to not use the irrational premise to interpet Magisterial Documents.
Similarly Pope Benedict was
not Magisterial when he asked the Society of St.Pius X to accept Vatican
Council II with a Fake and not Rational Premise, for canonical recognition. If
the SSPX did agree to accept Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise they would
be dishonest. The Fake Premise produces schism with the pre-1940s Magisterium.
Changing the interpretation of the Creeds with a False Premise is first class
heresy.
The popes are not Magisterial
when they accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) which used the False
and not Rational Premise, to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance. This was a mistake of Pope Pius XII and the Archbishop of
Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing. They can affirm the first part of the LOHO
and reject the second part which contradicts the first part, which is
traditional.
Similarly the Balamand
Declaration and the Joint Declaration with the Lutherans on Justification
ignored the exclusivist ecclesiology of Vatican Council II, when interpreted
with a Rational Premise. Lutherans are outside the Church without Catholic
faith and are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, CCC 846
etc).
Pope Benedict’s books
published by Ignatius Press are as obsolete as those of Archbishop Lefebvre
(Angelus Press).Both of them did not interpret Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise. They ignored the objective error in the LOHO.
In Ferrara-Comachio, Italy
where the Mayor is from the Lega Salvini political party, young traditionalist
priests were transferred. They did accept Vatican Council II interpreted
irrationally and they went back to Tradition. They could also have helped the
Lega candidate win by encouraging traditional values among the people,where there is a bridge named after Garibaldi. Their
transfer must be discussed in the Italian Parliament by the center right political
parties.
In my diocese and parish in Casalotti, Boccea, Rome the bishops and priests have to deny de fide teachings of the Catholic Church to please the political Left. This is an issue the Lega Salvini and Fratelli di Italia of Melloni, could bring up in Parliament. The same problem exists at the Rome Vicariate. They are forced to use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II etc. This is unethical.
CALL TO ACTION
1. An injustice is being done
to the Society of St.Pius X (Fraternita Sacerdotale San Pio X), at Albano, on
the outskirts of Rome. They are told to interpret Vatican Council II with the
Irrational and not Rational Premise as does Cardinal Semararo, the bishop of Albano.
It is unethical for Cardinal Semararo to use the False Premise.
2. The churches in Rome have
been confiscated by the Leftist governments which appoint Committees to oversee
their management. The police, mostly non Christians, are present at every Holy
Mass to monitor what the priest teaches. The priests should be free to accept
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and proclaim it in their homilies.
3. Pope Benedict must be asked
to acknowledge that all his books on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc were
written with a false premise supporting the Left. The conclusion was nontraditional
and false. This error should not be imposed upon students at the pontifical
universities in Rome. This is unethical. In his introduction for Senator Marcello Pera’s
book he did not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics in
harmony with Vatican Council II (Rational).Instead he supported a secular state
based upon the false exceptions to EENS present in Vatican Council II (Irrational).
4. Pope Francis must be asked
to acknowledge that all his encyclicals and Traditionis Custode were
written with Vatican Council II interpreted with the same Fake Premise. Priests
must not be forced to do the same and only then be allowed to offer Holy Mass
in Italy.
5. The Lega-Melloni Mayoral
candidates could ask the Vatican to come back to the Faith. Prof.Alberto
Melloni of the Bologna School interprets Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise
to create a False Break with Tradition. It is only then that the Italian
governments gives him over a million euros annually. His interpretation of
Vatican Council II is unethical and Pope Francis and the Italian Catholic
politicians do not object.
6. The Social Reign of Christ
the King in all political legislation can be sought and affirmed by all
Catholics and the center right political parties. This is possible with Vatican
Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise. This is the honest
interpretation of the Council Rome must choose. It does not have any exceptions
for EENS. So all need to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell is a priority.
7. The liberalism in the
Church comes with the use of the False Premise. Without the False Premise
Vatican Council II cannot be cited by pro-Masonic political parties (Partito
Democratico, Movimento Cinque Stelle etc) in Rome. The Council must no more be
cited to support Satanic values, like homosexual unions, abortion, contraception,
public immodesty, pornography and violence on the official media,
ecclesiastical rejection of the faith etc.
8. The center right political
parties must ask for an end to the leftist coercion and domination in
especially Catholic theology. President Sergio Mattarella and Prime Minister
Mario Draghi must only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.
9. The pontifical universities Regina Apostolurum and John Lateran in Rome teach Ratzinger Studies based upon Vatican Council II irrational and so political. The German theologians organizing this course produce a rupture with the historic Catholic Church in Rome and Germany. The seminarians and students of the universities have to accept their propaganda.
10. Pope Francis must be asked
to acknowledge that all his encyclicals and Traditionis Custode were written
with Vatican Council II interpreted with the same fake premise. So there now is
a fake rupture with the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church. Without this error the Church would be in
harmony with the old theology of historic Italy. So the two popes are dishonest.
Without the false premise they would emerge conservative, supporting extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political
legislation and the non separation of the Catholic Church and the Catholic State.
They would be welcomed by Le Pen and not Macron. Pope Francis must be asked to
only interpret Vatican Council II (Rational) in future.
11.The Vatican Press Office has
not denied that Pope Francis is in schism when he uses the common False
Premise to re-interpret Vatican Council
II(LG 14 etc) and so breaks with the past Magisterium.His interpretation of
Lumen Gentium 14( baptism of desire ) is different from that of Bishop
Athanasius Schneider, Dr.Taylor Marshall and
Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson.It is different from Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, former Italian
Rector and Dean of Theology, at the University of St. Anselm, Rome. The laity
at the Synods must choose only the rational interpretation of the Council.
Step 1: The Church should
avoid interpreting Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms, with the Fake
Premise which has spread in the Church. They must choose only the Rational Premise.
Then there is continuity with the Catholic Church of St.Francis of Assisi,
St.Catherine of Siena and Padre Pio. Jesus in the Catholic Church will once
again be the centre of all politics in Italy.
Step 2:The liberalism in the
Church comes from the use of the official False Premise. With this liberalism
the Catholic Church today does not oppose pro-Masonic political parties in Rome
which support homosexual unions, abortion, contraception, public immodesty,
pornography on the official media, pontifical heresy and schism in the Church
etc.Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise must no more be cited
to justify new moral and Eucharistic laws in Italy. Catholics now know that
they have a choice. It is rational, traditional, Magisterial and ethical.The
Wojtyla-Ratznger interpretation of Vatican Council II was made with the False
Premise.Pope Francis and Pope Benedict must be asked to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and bring the whole Church back to Tradition and not only those who go for the Latin Mass. -Lionel Andrades
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS
OF VATICAN COUNCIL II :
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
JUNE 10, 2022
Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not tell the truth to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
JUNE 9, 2022
Pope Paul VI did not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and instead chose the Irrational Premise : thousands of priests and nuns gave up their religious vocation
No comments:
Post a Comment