In North Hampshire,USA, Fr.
Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Manchester, USA interprets
Vatican Council II with the irrational Red chart and has placed sanctions
against the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, NH for using the rational Blue chart.
This is also dishonesty of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF),
Vatican.
Fr.Georges de Laire
refused CMTV an interview. Now is the time for him to affirm the Blue chart
before the media.
Damien Fischer writing
for the New Hampshire News and the New Hampshire Union Leader has said that
bishop Libasci has advised Catholics not to visit the St. Benedict Center in
NH. But the bishop and the Curia choose the Red and not Blue chart and are misleading
everyone. All lay people and the religious communities have to do the same.
Fischer says that the
CDF defends Catholic teachings from heresy. But the CDF uses the Red chart which
is heretical. The SBC choose the Blue and avoids the schismatic Red chart.
Fr.Georges de Laire
still will not tell CMTV, CNA, Catholic Herald U.K and the Union Leader New
Hampshire that he interprets Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise to reject
Feeneyite EENS. This of course is unethical and not Catholic.
Fischer does not say that the CDF is using the Red chart, they choose Cushingism. This is heretical and schism with the past Magisterium.The SBC avoids this error.
Fischer in his report calls the SBC a ‘heretical religious group’ who ‘cannot call themselves Catholic’. But the SBC is orthodox. They are not liberals who reject Tradition and they are not traditionalists who reject Vatican Council II.
Fischer writing in the
Union Leader of New Hampshire calls the SBC in NH ‘a sect’. But the SBC accept
the Catechism of the Catholic Church (rational). Pope Francis is their pope.
Also Mark Hayward
writing in the New Hampshire Union Leader calls the SBC ‘a sect’. But the SBC
affirm Vatican Council II (rational) and deny being a sect.
At the Traditional Latin
Mass in New Hampshire and the rest of New England, they use the irrational and
heretical Red chart. There is a rupture with the 16th century TLM.
Fr.Georges de Laire’s
interpretation of Vatican Council II is with the Red chart. He uses the False
Premise, Cushingism. So he avoids Feeneyite EENS with this ruse.
All the priests in
general in New Hampshire interpret Vatican Council II with the Red chart. I use
the Blue. So EENS is different for us. For me it is extra ecclesiam nulla salus
with no exceptions and for them it is extra ecclesiam nulla salus with
exceptions.
I interpret Vatican
Council II with the Blue chart but at all the Catholic schools in New Hampshire
they use the Red chart. Catholic schools in NH must interpret Vatican Council
II rationally and honestly and not like Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.
The SBC affirms Vatican
Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally and ethically
and yet a Decree of Prohibitions has been issued against them by the CDF. It is
Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and Fr. Georges de Laire
who are unethical and not Catholic.
Meredith Cook Esq.,
Chancellor of the diocese approves the Fake Premise and Inference used in the
interpretation of Vatican Council II by the bishop and the Judicial Vicar. It is approved by the Vatican. They also approve the Decree against the SBC. They
are unethical in public.
The SBC’s Doctrinal
Beliefs posted on their website Catholicism.org was not posted on the Diocese
of Manchester website by the bishop. Archbishop Augustine di Noia, Assistant Secretary of the
CDF, used the Red chart, with the Fake Premise. So the diocese of Manchester
website interprets CCC 847-848 with the Fake Premise, the Red chart. They then
slander the SBC on the diocese website and no correction of their error by the
SBC was allowed.
Di Laire, Peter Libasci
and Di Noia used a False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire. The SBC in
NH avoided it. It is unethical in public and it is approved by the Vatican.
They are dishonest in public. Is the false premise legal? They used the False
Premise to avoid Feeneyite EENS.
Archbishop Di Noia and
Fr. Georges de Laire used a False Premise in NH to interpret Vatican Council
II. This is a secular issue. It is public and unethical.
The Decree was issued
against Brother Andre Marie MICM since he would not interpret Vatican Council II
and EENS (baptism of desire) with the False Premise.
The Decree of
Prohibitions was coercion against Brother Andre Marie and the SBC, for not
using the False Premise like Di Noia, Libasci and De Laire to interpret Vatican
Council II etc.
Yes it was coercion when
they issued the Decree of Prohibitions against the SBC for not using a False
Premise like them.
If they did not use the
Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II they would be Feeneyite on
EENS.The Decreee of Prohibitions would apply to them.
So it was unethical when
they chose a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II to create an
artificial break with Feeneyite EENS.
If Archbishop Augustine di Noia and Fr. Georges de Laire did not use Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II, the Decree of Prohibitions, I repeat, would apply to them. -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment