The Church
must oppose the Satanists. We must oppose the Left. The Church must not accept
their irrational version of Vatican Council II. We can choose a Vatican Council
II which is always rational, traditional and honest. We can choose the Vatican
Council II of the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA. Brother
Andre Marie mcim interprets Vatican Council II without the common heresy. The
Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
(EENS).
Catholics
must reject the irrational version of EENS of the popes from Pius XII to Francis.
All the cardinals can reject the irrational Vatican Council II of the popes
from Paul VI to Francis. They can re-interpret the baptism of desire (BOD),
baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) rationally
like the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire in the diocese of Manchester, USA. In
this way we go back to the past understanding of the Church and what it teaches.
Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7), like the past Magisterium, still teaches that
all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. The Catechism of the Catholic
Church has Ad Gentes 7 placed under the title Outside the Church there is no
Salvation(CCC 846).The Catechism of Pope John Paul II says God the Father wants
all to be united in the Catholic Church. The Church is like the Ark of Noah
that saves in the flood (CCC 845).The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
(CDF), under Pope John Paul II, corrected the liberal Jesuit Fr. Jacques Dupuis
sj. The CDF issued a Notification. It said that all the members of the other religions
are oriented to the Church.
So this is
official and Magisterial. The Magisterium says today, like the Apostles, the
Church Fathers and the Bible (John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc) that outside the Church
there is no salvation. In Heaven there are only Catholics.
The irrational
1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston was wrong and Fr.
Leonard Feeney was correct. The Jesuit priest said there are no visible cases
of the baptism of desire.
So the Boston
Heresy Case referred to the heresy of the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal
Richard Cushing and Pope Pius XII. They interpreted physically invisible cases
of BOD, BOB and I.I as being visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the
Syllabus of Errors,the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) and the dogma
EENS ( Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1442).
Now we know
that the BOD, BOB and I.I are not objective people in 1949-2022.We will not be
able to see or meet a BOD, BOB and I.I case in 2023.
But Pope Pius XII, Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not seem to know this. This is the heresy now of the popes from Pius XII to Francis on EENS, BOD, BOB, I.I etc. This is the real Boston Heresy. They were all contradicting the dogma EENS. They believed that everyone did not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. The present two popes have also accepted the heretical 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. The Letter projected invisible cases of the BOD and I.I as being visible exceptions for apostolic EENS. So the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the original interpretation of the Nicene Creed were rejected. This was done by confusing what is invisible as being visible, unknown as known and implicit as explicit.
"There are no literal cases of the baptism of desire", said Bishop Athanasius Schneider in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall.
Marshall confirmed the same. He said there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas
Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire. Here Schneider and Marshall rejected the
political version of EENS and Vatican Council II.
Archbishop
Thomas E. Gullickson also said that the BOD and I.I were not exceptions for
EENS. He also thought that the SSPX could accept Vatican Council II and come
into the Church with canonical recognition. He meant of course, Vatican Council
II rational and not irrational. There would be the hermeneutic of continuity
with the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.
Today we can
also have unity not only with the traditionalists, but also the sedevacantist bishops Pivarunas and Sanborn. Vatican Council II (rational) is traditional. It
is the liberals who will have a problem. EWTN, National Catholic Register,
Catholic Answers, Catholic Culture and the main line Church interpret Vatican
Council II and EENS politically. They are supported by the CDF and the rest of
the Vatican. The heresy of EWTN is seen in a report on line, titled The Tragic
Errors of Fr. Leonard Feeney by Fr. William Most. It indicates that everyone
does not need to be a card carrying member of the Catholic Church. It
interprets the BOD and I.I of the 1949 Letter, and LG 14 and LG 16 of Vatican
Council II, as being objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So this is a
rupture with Vatican Council II (AG 7) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church
(845, 846, 1257 etc).It makes Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1442 on extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, obsolete.
This public
heresy created with an irrational premise, inference and conclusion in
philosophy, is supported by Mark Brumley, the President at Ignatius Press, Jeff
Mirus at Catholic Culture,Tim Price and Douglas Bushman at the Augustine
Institute, Denver and Jimmy Akins at Catholic Answers. Also Fr. Mitch Pacwa,
Scott Hahn and the Department of Theology at the University of Stuebenville,
have succumbed to this liberalism which has no theological foundation in
Vatican Council II.
Lay Catholics
must oppose this political interpretation of Vatican Council II. We are not
obligated to follow the public mistake of Rahner, Congar, Ratzinger and Kung. We have
a rational and traditional choice and it is not political.- Lionel Andrades
LINKS FROM THE RIGHT HAND SIDE BAR. CLICK TO ACCESS
- Vatican Council (Feeneyite) (1)
- Vatican Council has passages which support EENS and no passages which contradict EENS (1)
- Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) (4)
- Vatican Council II ( premise-free) (1)
- Vatican Council II (AG 7) (1)
- Vatican Council II (Cushingite) (8)
- Vatican Council II (Feeenyite) (6)
- Vatican Council II (Feeneyism) (1)
- Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) (2)
- Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) in harmony with EENS(Feeneyite) (2)
- Vatican Council II (Graphics) (1)
- Vatican Council II (premise-free) (9)
- Vatican Council II agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (3)
- Vatican Council II and EENS (2)
- Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents do not contradict Tradition (1)
- Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church indicate all non Catholics and non Christians who have died are in Hell. : no denial from the Vatican (1)
- Vatican Council II but interpreted with two different theologies (2)
- Vatican Council II Cushigite (1)
- Vatican Council II Cushingite (4)
- Vatican Council II does not conradict the Syllabus of Errors (2)
- Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus irrespective of your opinion on Fr.Leonard Feeney (2)
- Vatican Council II Feeneyite (8)
- Vatican Council II has passages which support EENS and no passage which contradicts EENS (Graphics) (1)
- Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS( Feeneyite) (1)
- Vatican Council II interpreted with a good conscience (1)
- Vatican Council II is a legitimate (1)
- Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not just pastoral. Franciscan Friar (1)
- Vatican Council II is Feeneyite (13)
- Vatican Council II is Feeneyite ( Graphics) (2)
- Vatican Council II is Feeneyite for me. (2)
- Vatican Council II is in harmony with Pope Boniface VIII (1)
- Vatican Council II is not a rupture with an ecumenism of return (1)
- Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the teachings on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation (1)
- Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition (5)
- Vatican Council II is not ambigous (2)
- Vatican Council II is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesia nulla salus(EENS) as Fr. Leonard Feeney understood it. (1)
- Vatican Council II is traditional (3)
- Vatican Council II Magisterial (1)
- Vatican Council II not a development with EENS according to the missionaries of the 16th century (1)
- Vatican Council II Reinterpreted (2)
- Vatican Council II riddled with philosphical error : the two popes in principle support an objective error in the Council-text (4)
- VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS (6)
- Vatican Council II says extra ecclesiam nulla salus (2)
- Vatican Council II says there are specific people in Hell. (1)
- Vatican Council II simple trick.Try it!.Most Catholics don't know about it (1)
- Vatican Council II supports extra ecclesiam nulla salus (3)
- Vatican Council II supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (3)
- Vatican Council II supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. (3)
- Vatican Council II supports the 'black and white position' on 'the Church's true teaching that "outside the Church there is no salvation" (2)
- Vatican Council II with BOD (1)
- Vatican Council II-ReReading it Rationally (1)
- Vatican Council II. Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (1)
- Vatican Council II's superflous passage (5)
- Vatican Council II( Cushingism) (1)
- Vatican Council II( premise free) (3)
- Vatican Council II(Cushingite). (7)
- Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) (13)
- Vatican Council II(premise free) (2)
- Vatican Council II(premise-free) (6)
- Vatican Council II/Feeneyite) (1)
- VATICAN COUNCIL SAYS (1)
- Vatican has no objections (2)
- Vatican has no objections if all Catholic religious communities affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise. (2)
- Vatican in agreement (2)
- Vatican is hiding the Leonard Feeney issue from secular newspapers (1)
- Vatican needs to apologise for the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (2)
FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR. CLICK TO ACCESS
- Letter of the Holy Office (12)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (98)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 can be read with the red passages not being exceptions to the blue passages or with the red passages being exceptions to the blue passages (1)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 error carried clearly into Vatican Council II (14)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 has heresy upon which so much of Vatican Council II is based. (5)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is heresy ( Graphics) (4)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 read with the Feeneyite-Cushingite model (2)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 referenced in Vatican Council II (1)
- Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with the for and neutral to EENS method (1)
- Letter of the Holy Office heretical and schismatic (5)
- Letter of the Holy Office heretical and schismatic.Placuit Deo (3)
No comments:
Post a Comment