An appeal
has to be made to the Italian Ministry of External Affairs telling them to
interpret Vatican Council II rationally and asking them to inform the Vatican
to also interpret the Council honestly. The Italian Government in principle,
must interpret Lumen Gentium 8, 14 and 16, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Gaudium et
Specs 22, Nostra Aetate 2 etc, in Vatican Council II as referring to
hypothetical cases only. They are not physically visible people saved outside the
Church in 2023.They are not objective examples of salvation without faith and
the baptism of water ( AG 7, LG 14).If anyone was saved outside the Catholic
Church it could only be known to God. There are none who can be known in our
human reality. While the norm for salvation according to Ad Gentes 7 is the
same as the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the
Syllabus of Errors etc.
So the
Vatican must return to an honest interpretation of Vatican Council II which
does not contradict Tradition.
Also the
Italian Ministry of Education must return to an honest interpretation of
Vatican Council II in the schools, colleges and universities.
This must
also be the norm for the Ministry of Interior, since it is rational and ethical.
The Governments of Poland, Spain, France, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Columbia, Portugal etc must be informed that the Italian government chooses to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly.When the pope and cardinals interpret Vatican Council II rationally, they automatically become traditionalists. They can only be conservative. Since with the Rational Premise ( LG 16 etc refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2023) there is no more liberalism in theology, there is no more a New Theology and a 'development of doctrine'.Rome returns to the Faith of the Church Fathers.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.fromrome.info/2023/01/19/bergoglian-cardinals-claim-benedict-xvis-resignation-was-confusing/
No comments:
Post a Comment