Why do we
continue to have reports critical of Vatican Council II? We simply interpret LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical and speculative
and the Council emerge traditional and ecclesiocentric.
Why must we
speak of Ratzinger’s contribution at Vatican Council II when with the Rational
Premise ( LG 16 refers to an invisible person in 1965-2023), Rational Inference
( invisible cases of LG 16 do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla
salus) and Traditional Conclusion ( Vatican Council II is in harmony and not a
break with the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition). This is the end of the liberal theology of Pope Benedict.
The leftist
system, within and outside the Catholic Church, want us to believe that the
Council is a break with Tradition. We cannot depend upon the popes, the CDF and
the Vatican. They do not tell us the truth. They are not Magisterial when they
choose an irrational and not rational premise. They oppose the Holy Spirit for
political reasons.
The French
Government for example, through schools and colleges is projecting Vatican
Council II as a break with Tradition. Also all the religious communities in
France, liberal and traditionalists are doing the same.
When the
French media refer to traditionalists. These are Catholic religious communities
and lay people, who reject Vatican Council II (irrational), as all Catholics
should, and they go back to Tradition. But they do not know about Vatican
Council II interpreted rationally.It does not contain any exceptions for the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
No comments:
Post a Comment