The SSPX
affirms Tradition and Bishop Bernard Fellay has said that they accept 90% of
Vatican Council II. They now only have to interpret Vatican Council II
rationally. Then they are not in schism with the popes over the centuries. It
is Pope Francis who is in schism since he rejects Tradition when he interprets
Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.
We have a
schismatic pope and this is a scandal. His error is being followed by the
cardinals, bishops and the rest of the Church. A schismatic pope is
automatically excommunicated until he corrects his mistake.
A pope has
to be Catholic and affirm Catholic teachings in public otherwise he is not a
pope.
The first
100 popes were martyrs. - Lionel Andrades
MARCH 24, 2023
The Boston Heresy is like the Arian heresy of past times
MARCH 23, 2023
The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/the-boston-heresy-is-objective-error.html
MARCH 23, 2023
A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always hypothetical.They are invisible cases in 1965-2023. So where are the exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed ?
Why do Catholic Answers and EWTN for example, officially reject the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church ?
Why must Catholics change the interpretation of the Creeds? This is a mortal sin of faith.
Why must Catholics affirm the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston?
Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must correct the error in public .
In inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism non Catholics must be told to interpret Vatican Council II without the Boston Heresy. Mortal sins of faith send people to Hell.
Without the Boston Heresy Vatican Council II would be saying that all non Catholics need faith and the baptism of water for salvation ( AG 7/LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).LG 8,14 and 16 etc are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, CCC 846 etc. There is no break with Tradition. So the Council does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).Vatican Council II is not a break with the Magisterium of the 12th to 16th century.- Lionel Andrades
MARCH 23, 2023
Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferrara, Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, Eric Sammons and Michael Matt, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with the Boston Heresy. It was the same with Mons. Brunero Gherardino, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon and Fr. William Most. This was the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and SSPX Resistance bishops.
MARCH 22, 2023
I have not written books on this subject and I have no intention of writing books in future. But one thing of which I am sure is that - there are no physically visible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in the present times.
MARCH 22, 2023
Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?
No comments:
Post a Comment