It is the SSPX which
should be telling Pope Francis and the cardinals to accept Vatican Council II. The
SSPX is in the driving seat since they support Tradition and the Council interpreted
rationally only supports Tradition.
The SSPX must interpret
Vatican Council II rationally and tell Pope Francis to do the same. They are not obliged to be irrational for political reasons.
There is no such thing as
a traditionalist version of Vatican Council. The Council is common for all LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc, can only be interpreted rationally. There is only one
normal option.One rational interpretation.
Since the SSPX supports
Tradition and the popes do not- it is the SSPX that has the winning card.
Is it legal, they must
ask, for example, for the judges of the Supreme Tribunal, Vatican, to interpret
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc, a being only hypothetical, invisible, theoretical, subjective…? Or
must they continue to interpret LG 8 etc irrationally as being objective exceptions
for the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors? - Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment