When I told the Dominican
Sister yesterday that the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop
of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney, referred to an invisible case,
so it was Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Cushing who were in heresy and schism and
not Fr. Leonard Feeney, this was too much for her. BOD and I.I were not practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.This is a discovery when you see through the false narrative on the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
I told her Fr. Leonard Feeney
was only supporting the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of
Florence (1442). They defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). These Councils did not
mention any exceptions. Over the centuries the Church considered the baptism of
desire etc as being invisible and not a practical exception for EENS. This is common
sense. They did not have any other choice.The baptism of desire etc is always theoretical for us human beings.
All this goes against the
false narrative this Dominican Sister is taught at the Angelicum on Fr. Leonard
Feeney, the 1949 LOHO, Vatican Council II etc.
To get a degree in
theology from the Angelicum she has to support what is irrational, nontraditional,
schismatic and unethical and assume this is Catholic orthodoxy.- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment