Cardinal Gerhard Muller has the
collected writings of Pope Benedict, which he updates, it was reported during
the life time of the last pope. But most of that is straw now. Since Pope Benedict
interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. He made a
mistake. His work is obsolete. It is there are as a reference but it has a
limitation. It is something like Vatican Council II. There are good things in
it inspired by the Holy Spirit , but 'the exceptions' of the 1949 Letter of the
Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, was an error made by Rahner,
Ratzinger, Kung, Congar and Murray. They erred. The result is there is so much
of superfluous material in the Council-text. Why had they to interpret LG 8, 14,
16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc with reference to the past exclusive ecclesiology? They
are not objective exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). When the 1949 LOHO mentioned the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, they were not objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS, for EENS in the 12th to 16th century, which did not mention any exceptions.- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment