Invisible people cannot be exceptions for EENS. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. For Pope Francis, the cardinals, bishops and the SSPX they refer to visible cases. If they were invisible cases for them , then they would be Feeneyites. But they deny this. They deny that their interpretation of the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc is Feeneyite.So they imply that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases and so LG 8 etc are exceptions for EENS . This is Cushingism.

 

JUNE 4, 2023

Invisible people cannot be exceptions for EENS. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. For Pope Francis, the cardinals, bishops and the SSPX they refer to visible cases. If they were invisible cases for them , then they would be Feeneyites. But they deny this. They deny that their interpretation of the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc is Feeneyite.So they imply that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases and so LG 8 etc are exceptions for EENS . This is Cushingism.

 

THE CATHOLIC CLASSICS ARE NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II

We can still read St.Catherine of Siena, St. Francis of Assisi, St. John of the Cross, St. Teresa of Avila…Their concept of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) was rational. Mortal sins, Hell, Purgatory have not changed.

After the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Vatican mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Archbishop of Boson relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney Catholic concepts were changed. But now we have identified the mistake in the 1949 Letter i.e invisible people were assumed to be visible. So the issue in the Church now is not between liberals and conservatives, but who interprets Vatican Council II rationally and irrationally. The conclusions are different.There are two conclusions because of the CDF mistake.

WE CAN AVOID THE CDF MISTAKE

When we avoid the invisible people are visible confusion Vatican Council II does not contradict the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic saints.So it means that most of the books published on Vatican Council II are obsolete.Since they assumed invisible people were visible.Invisible people cannot be exceptions for EENS. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. For Pope Francis, the cardinals, bishops and the SSPX they refer to visible cases. If they were invisible cases for them , then they would be Feeneyites. But they deny this. They deny that their interpretation of the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc is Feeneyite.So they imply that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases and so LG 8 etc are exceptions for EENS . This is Cushingism. 

They do  not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence.

So their interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational and dishonest. It differs from mine.

BOOKS WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED IRRATOINALLY ARE OUTDATED

The books they have written with this irrational  interpretation of the Council are now outdated. They belong to the past. We have a new discovery on Vatican Council II, a re-interpretation.

CATHOLICS INTERPRET THE NICENE CREED IRRATIONALLY AND HERETICALLY

These books are to be avoided. Since with the false premise ( invisible people are visible) they also change the Nicene Creed to, "  I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins. They also exclude the baptism of water" They would have to exclude the baptism of water  otherwise they would be saying that the baptism of water is always necessary for salvation in the present times and there are no visble exceptions for the dogma EENS.This would be Anti Semitic for the Jewish Left.

NEW POLITICALLY CORRECT VERSION OF THE APOSTLES CREED

Also to avoid the Anti Semitic charge, the Apostles Creed is understood differently. The Apostles Creed would mean, " I believe in the Holy Spirit , the Holy Catholic Church which now teaches that outside the Church there is known salvation while before 1949 it taught that outside the Church there was no salvation".This is the Apostles Creed interpreted with Cushingism and not Feeneyism. It is politically correct with the Left.

ATHANASIUS CREED REJECTED BY THE CDF

The Athanasius Creed would now say that not everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. This would be rejecting the text of this Creed.This is implied with the books on Vatican Council II which are interpreted irrationally with the invisible -people -are -visible in the present times, false premise.

Similarly the Catechisms would have two meanings, one rational and traditional and the other irrational and non traditional.- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search/label/Cushingism