Archbishop-elect
Joseph Kennedy does not accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (with no
exceptions), the Athanasius Creed (with no exceptions) and the Syllabus of
Errors (with no known exceptions for an ecumenism of return to the Catholic
Church).He also changes the understanding of the Nicene-Constantinople Creed.
This is first class heresy. It is also schism with the Magisterium over the centuries.
He can no more cite exceptions in Vatican Council II for the past ecclesiocentrism.
Hypothetical and invisible cases in 2024 of Lumen Gentium 16 etc are not
practical exceptions. An exception must exist in our reality. We cannot see or
meet someone saved outside the Church without ‘faith and baptism’ (AG 7).
There has been no denial from Kennedy or the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, in spite of so many reports on social media.
The trial of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano was
invalid in the sense that there is no doctrinal and theological continuity with
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith before 1949. They interpreted
all Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms etc) with the rational premise (invisible
cases are invisible) and the DDF chooses the irrational premise (invisible
cases are visible in the present times). So in the past they were traditional
and today they are liberal.
Archbishop
–elect Kennedy is not saying that he affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus like the missionaries of the 16th century.
He
is not saying that his understanding of the Nicene Creed is, “I believe in one
baptism for the forgiveness of sin, it is one known baptism the baptism of
water’. Instead it is “I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness
of sins and they exclude the baptism of water and so I am not a Feeneyite”.
No
one from the DDF affirms the Catholic faith in public. There is no
clarification.
Instead
Archbishop Augustine di Noia, former Secretary of the DDF (CDF) wrote a letter to Brother Andre Marie mcim, Prior, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St.
Benedict Center, New Hampshire in the Diocese of Manchester, NH. He wanted the
SBC to interpret invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the
baptism of desire (CCC 847-848) as being known exceptions for the dogma EENS
and CCC 845-846(Outside the Church No Salvation).
He
also did not permit the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to take an Oath
or affirm their Catholic Faith, by reciting the Athanasius Creed, as did Fr.
Leonard Feeney in Boston.
So
how can the DDF in public heresy and schism conduct a trial for schism? How can they have held a trial of Archbishop
Vigano while interpreting Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents
irrationally and so deceptively?
I
affirm EENS, the Athanasius Creed, and the Syllabus of Errors with no known exceptions.
I personally cannot know of any exceptions. This would be something known only
to God.
I
affirm Ad Gentes 7 in Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium not being an
exception.
I
affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845-846 (outside the Church no
salvation) with CCC 847-848 (invincible ignorance etc) not being exceptions. - Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment