Non Apostolic Visitation of the FSSP

 

Non Apostolic Visitation of the FSSP

 

The expected Vatican visitation of the FSSP, termed ‘an apostolic visitation’, is not apostolic in the sense of doctrine and theology. Since the Apostles held what would be termed by the secular media as ‘the strict interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They believed that there was salvation in only Jesus and the new Church, which he founded, as the Bible tells us. This was the will of God. He had sent a Savior to expiate for the sins of the world and so prevent souls from being lost to Satan in Hell, after the Fall.

The Church Fathers and Medieval popes, following the Apostles, affirmed the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Church for salvation. No exceptions are mentioned.But Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican does not affirm the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council. For him there are objective exceptions in Vatican Council II, when the Council is interpreted irrationally, confusing what is invisible as being visible. He projects invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being objective exceptions for the Apostles and Church Fathers' concept of there being exclusive salvation in only Jesus and the Catholic Church, the One Mediator.

Since Cardinal Fernandez accepts the irrational and nontraditional 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, he interprets Vatican Council II with the same irrationality. He also makes the same mistake in the interpretation of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. This is a public error. It can be verified in public. This is not apostolic. This is not part of the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, the Four Marks of the Church mentioned in the Nicene Creed. - Lionel Andrades