Fr.Pierpaulo Petrucci's removal could indicate that Bishop Bernard Fellay knows that Vatican Council II(Cushingite-with the premise) is a rupture with Tradition but Vatican Council II (Feeneyite-without the premise) is not.
But for political and other reasons he does not want to affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).
Sometime back he said that he would affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King.There must have been opposition.So he did not make any announcement.
Similarly he could affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II would no more , theoretically, be an obstacle for getting canonical recognition.But there was probably opposition from Cardinal Ladaria s.j.It would undo his life's work and that of Pope Benedict teaching false theology with irrational philosophy-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 17, 2017
Was Fr.Pierpaulo Petrucci removed for understanding Vatican Council II(Cushingite-with the premise) was a rupture with Tradition but not Vatican Council II (Feeneyite-premise free) ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/was-frpierpaulo-petrucci-removed-for.html
DECEMBER 16, 2017
The traditionalists are blocking the reconciliation of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) with the CDF/Ecclesia Dei since the bloggers are unable to affirm Feeneyte extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),which is central to the doctrinal crisis in the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/the-traditionalists-are-blocking.html
No comments:
Post a Comment