They have been emasculated; taught to go along, don't upset the
people; preach watered-down garbage to them like Alpha evangelization
and "Church Lady" RCIA classes; no wonder huge numbers of people leave
the Church, even after having gone through a year of RCIA.
They haven't been given the authentic faith in those classes, they
have been taught polite, non-confrontational, non-offensive milquetoast
with a dash of Bp. Barron's idiocy that we have a reasonable hope that
all men are saved. And for the record: no, we don't.-Michael Voris
https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-protecting-the-innocent
Jim
Farrell (on Church Militant TV) criticizes Fr. Leonard Feeney since for him BOD; BOB and I.I
are exceptions to EENS and so he cites the Letter of the Holy
Office(CDF) and Vatican Council II.When writing about Vatican Council II
and EENS on Church Militant TV he is critical of Fr.Leonard Feeney for
saying there are no cases of the BOD etc.
For
Jim Farrel, Jimmy Akins and most Catholics, there must be exceptions to
EENS otherwise their New Theology collapses.It would be a return to the
old theology with its rational reasoning.
The
New Theology, with its false reasoning , will determine, next week in
Manchester, if a Catholic is legally a Catholic for the Left and the
Vatican.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-new-theology-with-its-false.html
Church
Militant TV slanders Brother Andre Marie MICM and Fr. Leonard Feeney by
projecting a false theological position upon them : Jim Russell does
not know of any BOD, BOB and I.I case during his life time.
The Staff at Church Militant TV(CMTV) ignore numerous reports on line, the most recent on the blog The Eponymous Flower,
which state that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and
invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to hypothetical and imaginary cases in
2019.So they are not objective examples of salvation.They are not
exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Brother
Andre Marie MICM, covered this point in his correspondence with the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF).
CMTV however has posted a report by Jim Russell on Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center's alleged theological position.
CMTV
and Russell have not posted any article which mentions that BOD, BOB
and I.I are not practical exceptions to EENS.So the SBC does not have to
reject BOD, BOB and I.I.
Brother
Andre Marie has stated online that there are no personally known cases
of being saved in invincible ignorance. They can only be known to God.
Fr.
Leonard Feeney also had said that there were no literal cases of BOD.
We now know that BOD is not a known Sacrament and cannot be administered
like the baptism of water.Russell does not seem to know this.
Jim
Russell himself does not know of any literal case of BOD, BOB and I.I
in 2019 or during his lifetime.He omitted this central point in his
article. CMTV also ignores this error.
For
Jim Russell BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS.He then assumes
this is the theological position of the SBC and Fr. Leonard Feeney.How
can unknown people be exceptions to EENS for Brother Andre Marie ?
For
the Holy Office 1949 and the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II
there were exceptions to EENS .Since hypothetical cases were not
hypothetical.However this is not the reasoning of Brother Andre Marie
and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
The
doctrine of Fr. Leonard Feeney seems strange since Russell's premise
and inference is false.So the conclusion would be strange.It is not that
of the SBC.
Traditional doctrines on salvation are not strange.
Russel has repeated the usual Cushingite propaganda and then pegs it on the SBC and Fr. Leonard Feeney.
When
Brother Andre Marie says all need the baptism of water with no known
exception for salvation, he is repeating the dogmatic teaching.It is not
his private theological opinion as Russell suggests.
When
Brother Andre Marie says there are no personally known cases of BOD,
BOB and I.I this is something obvious and factual.It is common
knowledge.It was known to the popes and saints over the centuries.It is
not a private opinion.Even a non Christian can confirm this.
These points are not covered in CMTV's article by Russell on Fr. Leonard Feeney's alleged theological position.
After
some good programs on the Vortex by Michael Voris , on the problem
created by the CDF and the Left, for the SBC in the Diocese of
Manchester, the report by Jim Russell slanders Brother Andre Marie MICM
and Fr.Leonard Feeney.It does this by projecting a falsehood in their
name.
If Bradley Eli and Simon Rafe at CMTV are under pressure to say invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions
to 16th-century EENS, they should not slander Fr. Leonard Feeney and
the SBC for not mouthing the same irrationality.The Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary, as good Catholics, are under no obligation to
affirm this bad reasoning and deception.It is not their theology.
May be prohibitions would be placed on CMTV if it did not claim, unknown cases in 2019, as referenced in Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) as being known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.So theologically CMTV is forced to say that there is known salvation
outside the Church mentioned in Vatican Council II.Obviously there are
no such cases.There are none in Detroit.Russell did not mention
this.CMTV also has not posted an article discussing these points, even
though there are many reports online.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment