The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is not magisterial on Vatican Council II. Since there are two interpretations of the Council.One interpretation is rational and the other irrational, one is with the false premise and the other is without it.The CDF chooses the irrational interpretation. It uses the false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc).
The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. This is human error which has come from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It was then repeated at Vatican Council II.
So Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism and also mentions being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. This is a subtle error. Since the Council Fathers assumed I.I and BOD referred to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church.
Similarly Lumen Gentium 14 says those who know about Jesus and the Church and do not enter are oriented to Hell This is true. But all non Catholics in general need to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7). Those who know or do not know and are saved can only be known to God.
However the Council Fathers assumed that invincible ignorace referred to known salvation outside the Church and so were objective exceptions to EENS. This was the faulty reasoning of the LOHO. So LG 14 does not state that all in general, with no known exception, needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.
When unknown cases are considered known I call it Cushingism. When unknown cases are considered simply unknown I call it Feeneyism. Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 indicate that some of the Council Fathers were Cushingite. However since we know that unknown cases of I.I and BOD are not exceptions to EENS, we can interpret Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14, with Feeneyism. It is rational and traditional with Feeneyism.
The cardinal and archbishops at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith however interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism so their conclusion is non traditional.We can avoid their error.
They also expect the SSPX and the sedevacantists and all religious communities to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism for canonical recognition. They will not tell them to interpret the Council with Feeneyism and this is acceptable.
Similarly vocations to the religious life have to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. A rational interpretation of the Council is not promoted.
Catholics consider the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the popes since Paul VI as being magisterial. Since they are unaware of the rational interpretation of the Council .The popes and the CDF do not inform them about it. Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists make the same error as the CDF.
Pope Francis can interpret the Council without the false premise and then there will no 'hermenutic of rupture' with the past Magisterium of the Church.The Catholic Church will once more affirm exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.We cannot separate Jesus from the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation for all.Once the lay communities and religious organisations understand this, the mainstream Catholic Church is expected to be traditional once again. The concept of 'progressivist' and 'traditionalist' was created with the use of the false premise. Similarly the 'development of doctrine' was created with the false premise. When the false premise is avoided the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church is the same before and after Vatican Council II. There is no theological opening for the New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation and New Theology.
-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 14, 2020
Popes since Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise.The College of Cardinals do the same : the CDF and Bishop Athansius Schneider make the same error.
JUNE 14, 2020
When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and Bishop Athanasius Schneider use a false premise to create a rupture with the past Magisterium of the Church( before the 1930's), on exclusive salvation with no known exceptions, it is not magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake by confusing what is invisible as visible and hypothetical as real
JUNE 12, 2020
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the CDF want the tradtiionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM to use the false premise ( Graphics )
JUNE 12, 2020
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrists are unable to tell the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that they are using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.
JUNE 11, 2020
CDF is in public schism created with a false premise : announcement needed to end the scandal
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith_11.html
JUNE 11, 2020
On the website of the CMRI, of Bishop Pivarunas there is a long list of references to the baptism of desire as mentioned by the saints. But those saints do not interpret the baptism of desire with the false premise. It is the CMRI which uses the false premise to interpret the baptism of desire.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/on-website-of-cmri-of-bishop-pivarunas.html
JUNE 11, 2020
Phil Lawler forced to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/phil-lawler-forced-to-interpret-vatican.html
JUNE 10, 2020
CDF is not magisterial on the issue of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective error.
JUNE 10, 2020
CDF interprets Church-texts with a false premise (Graphics)
JUNE 10, 2020
CDF interprets Quanto Conficiamur, Quanta Cura,Mortalium Animus, Mystici Corporis and other Church-texts with a false premise.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/cdf-interprets-quanto-conficiamur.html
JUNE 10, 2020
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) want Catholics to interpret Magisterial documents (Creeds,Catechisms etc) with a false premise and inference
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html
JUNE 10, 2020
Diocese of Manchester, USA and CDF grant canonical status for religious communities which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/diocese-of-manchester-usa-and-cdf-grant.html
JUNE 9, 2020
Creeds have been changed and the cardinals follow the CDF error
JUNE 8, 2020
Bishop Athanasius Schneider indicates God does will a plurality of religions for salvation ( Graphics )
JUNE 8, 2020
The mainstream Catholic Church is expected to turn traditional once again
JUNE 7, 2020
CDF always interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not correct them
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/cdf-alwys-interprets-vatican-council-ii.html
JUNE 9, 2020
Are you a Feeneyite or Lefebvrist traditionalist ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/are-you-feeneyite-or-lefebvrist.html
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston can be interpreted with or without the false premise.Bishop Schneider needs to correct his error. A clarification from him is over due.
JUNE 6, 2020
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston can be interpreted with or without the false premise.Bishop Schneider needs to correct his error. A clarification from him is over due.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-letter-of-holy-office-1949loho-to.html
JUNE 5, 2020
When Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said that Rome must come back to the Faith he did not know that he was interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology and that without the New Theology Rome would have to come back to the Faith.
JUNE 5, 2020
The College of Cardinals and the popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no one is doing anything about it.
JUNE 5, 2020
The Judiciary in Italy, the Roman Rota, the Signatura, the Vatican Tribunal - are all interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premies and inference and they are not aware of it.
JUNE 5, 2020
Theological virus
_________________________________
MARCH 10, 2020
The Catholic Church once again will have unity in doctrine : apology needed from Pope Benedict
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-catholic-church-once-again-will.html
_____________________
MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS CAN BE INTERPRETED WITH 1)THE RED PASSAGESBEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES OR WITH 2)THE RED PASSAGESNOT BEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES.THE LATTER(2) IS RATIONAL.