The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is not magisterial on the issue of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective error. The Apostles did not teach that unknown cases are known exceptions to all need faith and the baptism of water for salvation. The Church Fathers did not teach that invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were visible exceptions to exclusive salvation in Jesus in the Catholic Church.
The CDF error on this issue is a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.So it is human error. It contradicts the Magisterium of the Church before the 1930's.-Lionel Andrades
______________________________
______________________________
JUNE 10, 2020
CDF interprets Church-texts with a false premise (Graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 9, 2020
JUNE 8, 2020
Bishop Athanasius Schneider indicates God does will a plurality of religions for salvation ( Graphics )
-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 31, 2019
There are no arguements to support exceptions to EENS. There cannot be any objective exception, whatever is the argument
OCTOBER 31, 2019
EWTN's Tragic Errors of Leonard Feeney by Fr. William Most present arguments which cannot be practical exceptions to EENS, they cannot violate Newton's Laws of Physics
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/ewtns-tragic-errors-of-leonard-feeney.html
___________________________
AUGUST 10, 2018
The moment you say that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS you infer that they refer to known people, visible people saved outside the Catholic Church : invisible people cannot be exceptions (Grafics)
___________________________
SEPTEMBER 23, 2019
A clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican
Pope Paul VI interpreted Lumen Gentium as an exception to the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology and ecumenism of return. Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) made the same mistake.Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Prefect of the CDF today made the same mistake last year at a press conference for Plaquet Deo.If a head of a corporation made this mistake he would resign.The same mistake is made by Pope Francis and his Curia of cardinals.No one asks them to recant or resign.
Pope Benedict and Cardinal Kasper's ecclesiology excludes exclusive salvation since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church for them. In this way they project exceptions to Tradition.If they were unknown and invisible non Catholics they would not be examples of salvation outside the Church. The Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed would not be obsolete as it is today.But they are known for them.
Now cardinals and bishops who view invisible people as being visible, confuse subjectivity with objectivity and what is implicit as explicit violate the Principle of Non Contradiction.They are considered responsible and mature people on the issues of finance, child protection etc.
A clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican on this issue.They need to inform the German cardinals and bishops, for example, and other bishops' conferences, that Lumen Gentium in its entire text, nowhere contradicts the Syllabus of Errors on ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. They need to inform the Bishop of Manchester,USA, Bishop Peter Libasci, that the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is not obsolete.
Pope Benedict, Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Mark Ouelett and Archbishop Rino Fisichella need to admit that in their articles on Ecclesiology, on line, they made a mistake. Lumen Gentium 8 is not an exception to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. We do not know any one saved outside the Catholic Church.
We do not know any one saved outside the Church with elements of sanctification and truth(LG 8). Neither do we know of any one saved without faith and the baptism of water(LG 14, AG 7) outside the visible Church, where the Catholic Church allegedly subsists(LG 8).
Similarly there are no personally known people saved in invincible ignorance, within or outside the Church(LG 16). Also the case of the hypothetical and unknown catechumen who does before receiving the baptism of water which he or she sought, and is allegedly now in Heaven, is still the case of the unknown catechumen(LG 14). So the baptism of desire never ever was an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Lumen Gentium could never be the theological basis for a New Ecumenism. Lumen Gentium was wrongly projected by Cardinal Ratzinger , as supporting a New Theology, New Ecclesiology and New Evangelisation, approved by Pope Francis.For him LG 16 and GS 22 contradicted the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return. The Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed were obsolete for him in a hermeneutic of rupture.-Lionel Andrades
Lumen Gentium could never be the theological basis for a New Ecumenism. Lumen Gentium was wrongly projected by Cardinal Ratzinger , as supporting a New Theology, New Ecclesiology and New Evangelisation, approved by Pope Francis.For him LG 16 and GS 22 contradicted the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return. The Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed were obsolete for him in a hermeneutic of rupture.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment