The German Synod was based upon the irrational
interpretation of Vatican Council II. Cardinal Marx has confirmed it. It is the only interpretation he knows. German Catholics now have a choice. Why should they use the irrational interpretation of the German cardinals, bishops and priests?-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 5, 2019
Cardinal Ratzinger's theology is the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.The interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is heretical and it is now common throughout the Church. He did not correct Pope Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.Instead he produced Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, based upon the irrational philosophy and theology and then projected it as the Deposit of the Faith
SUNDAY, AUGUST 16, 2020
The German Synodal Path is based on the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a false premise. Conservative Catholics could make a film and show the Cardinals and Bishops how the Council supports the Syllabus and EENS when theoretical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not considered objective exceptions to Tradition(Athanasius Creed etc).For the German episcopate these hypothetical cases were non hypothetical.
The German Synodal Path is based on the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a false premise. Conservative Catholics could make a film and show the Cardinals and Bishops how the Council supports the Syllabus and EENS when theoretical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not considered objective exceptions to Tradition(Athanasius Creed etc).For the German episcopate these hypothetical cases were non hypothetical.-Lionel Andrades
SUNDAY, JULY 11, 2021
Coetus Internationalis Patrum made a mistake at the Amazon Synod they are repeating it with Cardinal Jean Claude Hollerich sj General Relator of the Synod on Synodality 2023
Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich, S.J the General Relator of the Synod on Synodality (2023) like the General Relator of the 2019 Amazon Synod , Cardinal Claudio Hummes did not explain the difference between Vatican Council II interpreted with or without a false premise, and simply interpreted the Council with a false premise to create a parallel new Church, which is an artificial rupture with Tradition.
The Coetus Internationalis Patrum, traditionalist Catholics in Italy, cited Dominus Iesus interpreted with the false premise before the Amazon Synod asking for the Amazon people to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with exceptions). Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise; and with the rational premise.This would make the Council ecclesiocentric in its ecclesiology
The four point criticism of the Amazon Synod, Working Paper,issued by Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) was based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
They used the common false premise.So they could not cite Ad Gentes 7 to support the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, with LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc not being exceptions; not being practical exceptions to AG 7 and Feeneyite EENS.
With the false premise with which he interprets Magisterial documents, un-checked by the Lefebvrists who make the same mistake, he will reject Traditional Mission, at the 2023 Synod, titled, “For a synodal Church: communion, participation and mission”.
He will deliver an introduction to the Synod and also write the final document, interpreting the Council, the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II with the fake premise, producing new doctrines.
At the Amazonian Synod the Brazilian Cardinal Claudio Hummes, rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church by citing Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. It was also a negation of the First Commandment.
The Instrumentum Laboris and the final document on the Amazon Synod was based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. An irrational premise, inference and conclusion was used by Cardinal Hummes and the cardinals and bishops to interpret the Council as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( which has no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation with no exceptions) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q and 27 Q -outside the Church no salvation with invincible ignorance not being an exception).
-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 8, 2020
At the Amazonian Synod the Brazilian Cardinal Claudio Hummes, rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church by citing Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. It was also a negation of the First Commandment
At the Amazonian Synod the Brazilian Cardinal Claudio Hummes, rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church by citing Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. It was also a negation of the First Commandment. -Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search?q=Cardinal+Claudio+Hummes
JANUARY 29, 2020
The Synodal Path of the German Bishops begins on January 3o and it is based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Also the Amazon Synod was theologically based upon Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally. This was confirmed by Cardinal Hummes. He said that the basis of the decisions and changes at the Amazon Synod, was Vatican Council II. He meant the Council , interpreted irrationally.
The Synodal Path cannot interpret invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being a visible rupture with EENS as it was known but this is also the false interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II , by Cardinal Hummes.
Cardinal Marx and the German Bishops are giving out mis-information to the German people, the Government and the media. The Church-State relations are based upon a dishonest interpretation of Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment