eucharistandmission: The Instrumentum Laboris and the final document on the Amazon Synod was based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. An irrational premise, inference and conclusion was used by Cardinal Hummes and the cardinals and bishops to interpret the Council as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( which has no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation with no exceptions) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q and 27 Q -outside the Church no salvation with invincible ignorance not being an exception).

Friday, February 14, 2020

The Instrumentum Laboris and the final document on the Amazon Synod was based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. An irrational premise, inference and conclusion was used by Cardinal Hummes and the cardinals and bishops to interpret the Council as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( which has no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation with no exceptions) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q and 27 Q -outside the Church no salvation with invincible ignorance not being an exception).

Image result for Photo Querida Amazonian

The Instrumentum Laboris and the final document on the Amazon Synod was based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. An irrational premise, inference and conclusion was used by Cardinal Hummes and the cardinals and bishops to interpret the Council as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( which has no exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation with no exceptions) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q and 27 Q -outside the Church no salvation with invincible ignorance not being an exception).

Instead for the Amazon Synod cardinals and bishops there was no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc though unknown, theoretical and hypothetical in reality were interpreted as being exceptions to the traditional teaching on no salvation outside the Church. So it was implied that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc refer to visible and not invisible cases for them to be exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. It was implied with the false premise, that unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance in the present times, were known exception to Feeneyite EENS.

So with this irrationality a Working Paper was produced.

Pope Benedict and Cardinal Hummes need to acknowledge that Vatican Council II can be intepreted with the rational premise, inference and conclusion and there would be no rupture with the dogma EENS, the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Athansius Creed.