The FBI defines
radical-traditionalist Catholics as people who
are typically characterized by the
rejection of the Second Vatican Council "Vatican II" as a valid
church council; disdain for most of the popes elected since Vatican II,
particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II; and frequent adherence to
anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ, and white supremacist ideology.
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/cm-responds-to-fbi-memo
This distinction between radical-traditionalist Catholic and the rank and file Catholic in the main line Church, with Mass in the vernacular, has ended.It is now known that
Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a Rational Premise instead of the
present common Irrational Premise. It is only with the Fake Premise that there is a break with Tradition.
So in future the main line Catholic Church, which has
Holy Mass in the vernacular will only be able to interpret Vatican Council II
rationally. This would be the ethical thing to do.So the FBI would have to
classify and persecute the whole Church and not just those who go for the Latin
Mass.
The understanding of the main line Church today and in the future, would be the same as those who went for the Latin Mass in the 16th century.
We now have a discovery which was not known in 1965.
We now know how the hermeneutic of continuity can always be created with Vatican Council II. We also know precisely what produces the break with Tradition. So we can avoid it.
When Vatican Council II is interpreted with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc referring to only theoretical and speculative cases and not actual, known people in the present times, then there are no objective examples of salvation mentioned in Vatican Council II. There are no practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment