https://fsspx.it/it/la-casa-del-distretto-albano-laziale
Tomorrow in Rome, the SSPX
priest Fr. Federico Montini and Fr.Davide, the District Superior of Albano will offer the Latin Mass at
the SSPX chapel in Rome. He will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally as usual.
So he will have changed the interpretation of the Creeds .His interpretation of
the Catechism of Pius X will be different from me.
https://fsspx.it/it/il-seminario
Changing the
interpretation of the Creeds and choosing publically not to interpret Vatican
Council II is an impediment of offering the Latin and Novus Ordo Mass.
I have mentioned this
before and none of the SSPX priests have denied it.
https://fsspx.it/it
For political reasons they
are no affirming the Catholic faith in public and they accuse others of being
modernists etc.
If the SSPX priest in Rome
interprets Vatican Council II rationally then he will be affirming the strict
interpret of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since Ad Gentes 7 says all
need faith and the baptism of water for salvation and Lumen Gentium 14 (baptism
of desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (being saved in invincible ignorance), etc, will
not be objective exceptions. The priests and the laity present at the Latin
Mass do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS in public i.e. EENS according to the
Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which did not mention any exceptions.
For the traditionalists
and liberals at Vatican Council II there were exceptions. This was the original
mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston
relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
So now the priests at the
SSPX chapel are prudent and political. They are not proclaiming the Catholic
faith in public.
Instead they are promoting
mortal sins of faith with new versions of the Creeds and offer Holy Mass as if
all is normal.
They also criticize the
Novus Ordo Mass and preach as if they have superiority in doctrine, or at
least, are following traditional doctrine.
But interpret Magisterial
Documents with an irrational premise is not Church doctrine. It is heresy and
schism.
There is no comment from
the SSPX priests and neither do they want to issue a statement.
A conference will be held by the SSPX at Rimini this month according to their website. All the speakers are expected to interpret the Council irrationally and not rationally.- Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 10, 2023
SSPX Superior General addresses another conference oblivious of his error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds and the rest of Tradition
I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical and subjective and they interpret LG 8 etc as being objective examples of salvation outside the Church. Their premise is what is invisible is visible and mine is what is invisible is invisible only.
So their inference is that visible cases of LG 8 etc are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For me they are not exceptions. Since invisible people cannot be visible exceptions.
For them Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition (EENS, Athanasius Creed etc) since there are objective cases of LG 8 etc. For me Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition since there are no objective exceptions in 1065-2023.
For me Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. Does AG 7 support Tradition? While hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council.
So for them there is a separation with the Magisterial over the centuries and for me there is continuity.
They have changed the doctrine on salvation and I have maintained it.- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment