‘The hermeneutic of continuity
with Tradition’ or ‘the development of doctrine with Vatican Council II’
depends upon how you interpret the hypothetical (red) passages. So do they refer to physically invisible or visible cases in 2024 for you?
1. If they are physically visible cases then they are examples
of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so they contradict the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). The past ecclesiocentrism
is made obsolete. The door is open for liberalism and innovation (Synods,
Amoris Laetitia etc).
2. If they are physically invisible cases they are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, Traditional Mission and the need for all to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
NO EXCEPTIONS FOR THE PROCLAMATION OF THE SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING
There are no exceptions for the dogma EENS and so the need for a Catholic State and the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics. There is no break with Tradition (Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, Catechisms of Trent and Pius X). There is no break with the orthodox (blue) passages in Vatican Council II. The Council has a coherence within itself.Only when the red hypothetical passages are interpreted rationally, as being only hypothetical cases ; invisible people in the present times.
THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITIONAL MISSION
There are no exceptions for Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So the Catholic Church returns once again to the traditional mission of the Jesuits in the Middle Ages. The doctrine has no changed with Vatican Council II.
This is the only rational option, available for all. It is only in this, one, way that Vatican Council II can be ethical and Magisterial. There is only one rational option for the popes, cardinals, bishops, priests, religious communities...Their present interpretation is irrational, non ethical,non traditional , heretical, schismatic and non Magisterial.-Lionel Andrades
______________________
______________________
NOVEMBER 6, 2017
There is a mistake in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus
Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus have a mistake.
Dominus Iesus, Redemptoris Missio carry the Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani mistakehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/dominus-iesus-redemptoris-missio-carry.html
NOVEMBER 6, 2017
Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus were written with the 'possibilities are exceptions' errorhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/pope-john-paul-ii-and-cardinal-joseph.html
NOVEMBER 6, 2017
Bishop Robert J.McManus and Brother Thomas Augustine MICM,Superior,St.Benedict Center,Still River,MA, interpret Vatican Council II with the 'possibilites are exceptions' error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/bishop-robert-jmcmanus-and-brother.html
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict also used the false premise and conclusion from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
DECEMBER 24, 2016
In Dominus Iesus Cardinal Ratzinger repeats mistakes of Redemptoris Missio :irrational philosophy creates non traditional theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/in-dominus-iesus-cardinal-ratzinger.html
DECEMBER 23, 2016Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective mistake in Redemptoris Missiohttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/cardinal-ratzinger-made-objective.htmlDecember 22, 2016Card.Ratzinger's error in the ITC papers is also there in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/cardratzingers-error-in-itc-papers-is.htmlDECEMBER 22, 2016Cardinal Ratzinger 's work : a rupture between faith and reasonhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/cardinal-ratzinger-s-work-rupture.htmlDECEMBER 12, 2015Irrational Cushingism theology in the Document on the Jews is also there in Redemptorist Missio and Dominus Iesushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/irrational-cushingism-theology-in.htmlMARCH 16, 2015Once a traditionalist or sedevacantist has an insight into all this Vatican Council II dramatically changeshttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/message-incomplete-we-dont-know-any-one.html-Lionel Andrades
MONDAY, MAY 14, 2018
Errors in Dominus Iesus : It is because of Pope Benedict that there is so much doctrinal confusion in the Church. Catholics have to accept heresy.This was considered orthodoxy by Cardinal Ratzinger
Since Cardinal Ratzinger used Cushingite instead of Feeneyite theology to interpret Vatican Council II, as he refers to an ‘ecclesiocentrism' of the past ' (Dominus Iesus 19) 1 which is no more the eccclesiology of the present times for him.This is a scandal.
He first uses and irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then we he creates a non traditional conclusion which is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the rest of Tradition, he refers to an ecclesiocentrism of the past, as if that is not the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church any more.
Holy Spirit would not use a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition.
It is because of Pope Benedict that there is so much doctrinal confusion in the Church.
So theoretical cases are actual, real people for Cardinal Ratzinger. Otherwise how could they be exceptions to EENS? Someone must exist to be an exception.So with this philosophical error ( deception?) they did away with exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.They wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus with this error.
- Bishop Bernard Fellay (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82
Bishop Bernard Fellay made a factual mistake in Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82 : we cannot see the dead.
(SSPX) refers to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He says it is contradicted by Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 8 and Nostra Aetate 2 in Vatican Council II which refer to salvation for non Catholics.
In Dominus Iesus Cardinal Ratzinger repeats mistakes of Redemptoris Missio :irrational philosophy creates non traditional theologyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/in-dominus-iesus-cardinal-ratzinger.html2. DECEMBER 20, 2017
Dominus Iesus is not Feeneyite but uses the irrational Cushingite theology.Cardinal Kasper is correct. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/12/question-for-matthew-bellisario-so-you.html3.
NOVEMBER 6, 2017Dominus Iesus were written with the 'possibilities are exceptions' error. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/pope-john-paul-ii-and-cardinal-joseph.html
MAY 14, 2018Most of Redemptoris Missio cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective and factual mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/most-of-redemptoris-mission-cannot-be.htmlMAY 13, 2018
MAY 14, 2018
Missionary work among non Christians non relevant : Cushingite theology ended it http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/missionary-work-among-non-christians.htmlMAY 13, 2018
With Redemptoris Missio's Cushingite theology 'the dogma of the faith was lost' (Graphics) http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/with-redemptoris-missios-cushingite.htmlMAY 13, 2018At Fatima Our Lady could have been referring to the future work of the liberals including Cardinal Ratzinger http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/at-fatima-our-lady-could-have-been.html MAY 12, 2018Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective error in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus :
we can undo the mistake and re-interpret Vatican Council II (Graphics)http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-ratzinger-made-onbjective.htmlMAY 12, 2018Repost : There is a mistake in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus : objective mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/repost-there-is-mistake-in-redemptoris.html
we can undo the mistake and re-interpret Vatican Council II (Graphics)
MAY 11, 2018Parts of Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger cannot be magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake : the false theology is also there in the new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli) http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/redemptoris-missio-and-dominus-iesus-of.html JUNE 27, 2016THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE CONSTITUTION ON THE CHURCH, VATICAN II, ‘LUMEN GENTIUM’ IS FEENEYITE : FOR CARDINAL RATZINGER AND THE INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION IT IS CUSHINGITE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-ecclesiology-of-constitution-on.html
All the Cardinals and Bishops at the Synod on the family in their catechesis will use the irrational right hand column in the intepretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/all-cardinals-at-synod-on-family-in.html#links
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-s.html#linksOCTOBER 2, 2014
CCC 1257-1260: If we do not know any such person in 2014 then how can we say theoretically, God is not limited to the Sacraments, every one does not need the Baptism of water http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/ccc-1257-1260-if-we-do-not-know-any.htmlhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/06/ccc-1257-god-is-not-limited-to.htmlMAY 12, 2018Repost : There is a mistake in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus : objective mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/repost-there-is-mistake-in-redemptoris.html
MARCH 20, 2012Bishop Fellay, Fr.Schmidberger,FSSP,Joseph Fenton seem unaware the baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/bishop-fellay-frschmidbergerfsspjoseph.html
_________________________________
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2014
Franciscans of the Immaculate, SSPX note : Cardinal Ratzinger used an irrational inference in the interpretation of Dominus Iesus
In Dominus Iesus Cardinal Ratzinger chose the irrational inference and rejected the traditional dogma on salvationhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/in-dominus-iesus-cardinal-ratzinger-has.html
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2019
Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus
The Oct. 1 statement issued by an annonymous group the Coetus Internationalis Patrum(CIP) Working Group (International Group of Fathers) cited Dominus Iesus against the Working Paper of the Amazon Synod- but Dominus Iesus is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.Cardinal Ratzinger was a Cushingite who rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.The CIP has cited Dominus Iesus 14 and 16.
Why should students at the pontifical universities have to study pastoral theology and ecclesiology with this irrationality? Should they not be free to interpret hypothetical and theoretical cases(LG 8 etc) as not being objective exceptions to the past exclusive ecclesiology in 2019?
Whatever are the arguments on Fr. Leonard Feeney or the Letter of the Holy Office 1949,Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment