Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must ask the Dicastery
for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican if LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. The DDF must
be asked to announce that LG 8 etc refer to physically invisible cases in
1965-2024.This is now an issue for Canon Law and secular law. Many people are
affected.
Will the DDF tell the truth or continue to lie?
Will Pope Francis say Vatican Council II is to be
interpreted as he chooses – and this is the Magisterium- or will he apologize
and say that the Church made a mistake? Since LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases
in 2024, they could not be objective examples of salvation outside the
Church. They could not be practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed. Will he admit this?
In the past he refused. He told the National Cathechetical Center, Italy that Vatican Council II is to be interpreted as he chooses. He meant with the fake premise and inference to produce a non traditional conclusion.
If the pope continues to refer to LG 9 etc as visible
cases in the present times, then this is a moral issue and Canon Lawyers must
be employed by Archbishop Vigano.
This is also a secular issue since the pope is
unethical and is forcing Archbishop Vigano, to accept a lie or be expelled from
the Catholic Church.
This is a painful subject but we have to go through it if the Catholic Church must return to Tradition; to the Catholic Faith and - so that injustices will not be done to conservative Catholics, in the name of Vatican Council II (irrational).
Once
the DDF formally announces that LG 8 etc refer to hypothetical cases, invisible
people in 2024, it means the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop
of Boston made an objective mistake. The baptism of desire (LG 14) was never an
objective exception for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). It means there is nothing in Vatican
Council II to contradict EENS, as it was defined by the three Church Councils,
which did not mention any exceptions.
So Vatican Council II is saying that all need faith
and baptism for salvation (AG 7) and LG 8,14,15,16 etc are not exceptions.
The Catholic Church returns to its past ecclesiology.
It is the end of the New Theology based upon the mistake of the 1949 LOHO. This
would be the end of Vatican Council II (irrational).
It would mean that the DDF and Pope Francis now
support what the political Left disparaging calls ‘triumphalism’. Politically they both
may not want this but morally they have no other choice. Since Vatican Council
II can only be interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc,
refer to invisible cases in 2024.
Even the judges of the Signatura, Vatican would be
forced to be rational on this issue.
Then at the secular level-aside from the judiciary,
even a school boy would admit that LG 8 etc, refer to invisible cases in
2024.We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Catholic Church and who is
in Heaven . This can only be known to God.
It was painful for many, when Pope Paul VI interpreted
Vatican Council II irrationally, and many religious gave up their vocation, it
will be painful for many today when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II
rationally, and takes the Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment