Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must ask the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican if LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. The DDF must be asked to announce that LG 8 etc refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2024.

 

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano must ask the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican if LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. The DDF must be asked to announce that LG 8 etc refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2024.This is now an issue for Canon Law and secular law. Many people are affected.

Will the DDF tell the truth or continue to lie?

Will Pope Francis say Vatican Council II is to be interpreted as he chooses – and this is the Magisterium- or will he apologize and say that the Church made a mistake? Since LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases in 2024, they could not be objective examples of salvation outside the Church. They could not be practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed. Will he admit this?

In the past he refused. He told the National Cathechetical Center, Italy that Vatican Council II is to be interpreted as he chooses. He meant with the fake premise and inference to produce a non traditional conclusion.

If the pope continues to refer to LG 9 etc as visible cases in the present times, then this is a moral issue and Canon Lawyers must be employed by Archbishop Vigano.

This is also a secular issue since the pope is unethical and is forcing Archbishop Vigano, to accept a lie or be expelled from the Catholic Church.

This is a painful subject but we have to go through it if the Catholic Church must return to Tradition; to the Catholic Faith and -  so that injustices will not be done to conservative Catholics, in the name of Vatican Council II (irrational).

Once the DDF formally announces that LG 8 etc refer to hypothetical cases, invisible people in 2024, it means the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston made an objective mistake. The baptism of desire (LG 14) was never an objective exception for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). It means there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict EENS, as it was defined by the three Church Councils, which did not mention any exceptions.

So Vatican Council II is saying that all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7) and LG 8,14,15,16 etc are not exceptions.

The Catholic Church returns to its past ecclesiology. It is the end of the New Theology based upon the mistake of the 1949 LOHO. This would be the end of Vatican Council II (irrational).

It would mean that the DDF and Pope Francis now support what the political Left disparaging calls ‘triumphalism’. Politically they both may not want this but morally they have no other choice. Since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to invisible cases in 2024.

Even the judges of the Signatura, Vatican would be forced to be rational on this issue.

Then at the secular level-aside from the judiciary, even a school boy would admit that LG 8 etc, refer to invisible cases in 2024.We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Catholic Church and who is in Heaven . This can only be known to God.

It was painful for many, when Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally, and many religious gave up their vocation, it will be painful for many today when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II rationally, and takes the Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades