Novus Ordo priests who accept Vatican Council II and
interpret it rationally and not irrationally, could also be considered
schismatic by Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez. In the past schism was
teaching something new, now schism is not accepting what is new. It is not accepting the liberalism
which comes from Vatican Council II interpreted dishonestly. So if you do not
accept the ‘reforms’ of Vatican Council II then you have not accepted Vatican
Council II, irrational. You could belong to a sect but not the Catholic Church.
So the priests who offer the Novus Ordo Mass could be in
schism like the SSPX priests if they accepted Vatican Council II interpreted
rationally and so in harmony with the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus.
For Archbishop Vigano, Pope Francis is in schism since he does not support the past popes and the past Magisterium on the Athanasius Creed etc.Pope Francis does not deny this. He says that Vatican Council II (interpreted irrationally) is a break with Tradition. So he rejects the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. For him the baptism of desire, refers to physically visible cases in 1949-2024.
So the schism charge is specific .It is only for those
who do not accept Vatican Council II (irrational).Even those who accept Vatican
Council II rational could be in schism. Their interpretation of Vatican Council
II would not be magisterial for Pope Francis.
So one’s concept of schism- which is now something new
in the Church- must not be restricted to those who go for the Latin Mass.
Since even those Catholics who are not in communion with the
pope, who support the popes over the
centuries would be in schism. For Pope Francis the popes over centuries are made obsolete with
Vatican Council II irrational.
If a Catholic accepts the teachings of the popes, over
the centuries in specific cases, then he or she is schismatic since they have rejected Vatican
Council II, irrational.
- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment